Skip to main content
. 2005 Apr 25;169(2):355–366. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200411012

Table II. Transcripts with highest enrichment in synaptic compared with extrasynaptic samples.

Rank Ratio UniGene (Mm.) Gene Name Validity
1 83.64 4980 AChRɛ K-R
2 56.78 4583 AChRα1 K-R
3 30.28 79127 Dynein int. chain 1 SY-?
4 20.76 291463 Trifunctional enz.-β
5 18.93 276739 SOX10 SC
6 16.39 29742 CD24 Sy-M
7 16.28 37644 rep seq
8 15.22 66293 SDR2 Sy-?
9 14.91 33268 Ssb4 Sy-?
10 13.32 5025 PEA3 SC
11 12.86 225050 Unc53H3 Sy-M
12 11.63 16148 MuSK K-R
13 11.40 155708 ERM K-R
14 10.88 23742 Nestin K-P
15 10.49 172931 rep seq
16 10.40 211477 LL5β Sy-M
17 10.14 317642 Serf2
18 9.69 124666 NTA Sy-M
19 8.88 4980 AChRɛ K-R
20 8.63 32648 unnamed Sy-?
21 8.46 30039 PKARIα K-R
22 8.40 2811 AChRδ K-R
23 7.67 9986 MPZ SC
24 7.58 295263 Cpg16 Sy-?
25 7.52 335452 noncoding RNA

Rankings and ratios, calculated as in Table I and Table S1, respectively, are shown along with UniGene number (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) and gene name. Last column classifies genes: K-R, known to be synaptic at RNA level; K-P, known to be synaptic at protein level; SC, known to be selectively expressed by Schwann cells; Sy-M, synaptic mRNA shown by in situ hybridization to be expressed by muscle in this study; Sy-?, mRNA shown to synaptic by quantitative PCR, but cell of origin unknown; –, no evidence for synaptic enrichment.