Figure 5.
Furrow abscission and regression in micromanipulated cells. Unless indicated, time is given in minutes. (A) An aster-containing pocket, produced as in Fig. 1, undergoes successful furrow initiation (0–68 min, arrows) and ingression (88), but fails in abscission due to furrow regression (16 h). (B) A cell lacking both asters and pronuclei, manipulated as in Fig. 2, is fully capable of furrow induction (12–45, arrows), ingression (72), and normal abscission (17.1 h; see Video 4, available at http://www.jcb.org/cgi/content/full/jcb.200301073/DC1). (B') Rhodamine dextran microinjected into one daughter cell gradually flows into the other in both visually abscised experimental cells (aster removal, 17.3–17.8 h after cleavage initiation) and nonmanipulated controls (control, 17.2–17.7 h after cleavage initiation). (C) Despite normal furrow induction and ingression (155–243, arrows), cells containing only microtubules, manipulated as in Fig. 3, usually fail to separate (315–390, arrow; see Video 5, available at http://www.jcb.org/cgi/content/full/jcb.200301073/DC1). An exception is shown in Fig. S2, available at http://www.jcb.org/cgi/content/full/jcb.200301073/DC1. Bars, 10 μm.