Skip to main content
. 2003 Mar 17;160(6):833–843. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200211116

Table II. Mitotic stability depends on the timing of Chl4p loss relative to introduction of centromere DNA.

Plasmid Wild type chl4Δplasmid Wt + plasmid chl4Δ
Stable(80–90%) Unstable Stable Unstable(0.08–5%) Stable(60–90%) Unstable(0.08–5%)
pYe (CEN3) B 10/10 0/10 0/15 15/15 12/27 15/27
pYe (CEN3) 30 10/10 0/10 0/15 15/15 20/36 16/36
pYe (CEN3) 41 10/10 0/10 0/15 15/15 17/32 15/32

Centromere plasmids (pYe [CEN3] B, pYe [CEN3] 41, or pYe [CEN3] 30) were introduced into wild type and chl4Δ mutants (left and middle columns). Plasmid-bearing cells were selected, and plasmid stability was determined as described in the Materials and methods. Centromere plasmids are stably segregated (80–90%) in 30/30 wild-type cells (left column). In 45/45 chl4Δ mutants, <5% of cells contained plasmids upon nonselective growth. In the right column, cells containing the indicated centromere plasmids were transformed with chl4Δ::KANr. Mitotic stability measurements revealed heterogeneity in plasmid stability: 60–90% stability (49/95) and 0.08–5.0% stability (right column, 46/95).