Skip to main content
. 2002 Feb 18;156(4):715–724. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200109047

Table II. Characterization of pauses in droplet motion.


Pause duration
Time between pauses
Percentage reversals associated with a pause
s s
Pauses after minus-end travel
wild-type (*) 0.62 ± 0.03 5.03 ± 0.31 13.8
Dhc64C6-10/Dhc64C 8-1 (*) 0.76 ± 0.03 4.24 ± 0.31 17.4
Dhc64C6-10/+ 0.62 ± 0.03 3.99 ± 0.29 14.2
Dhc64C8-1/+ 0.70 ± 0.03 2.98 ± 0.18 17.5
Gl 1/+ 0.64 ± 0.04 4.24 ± 0.31 13.4
Pauses after plus-end travel
wild-type (*) 0.55 ± 0.20 7.63 ± 0.45 11.7
Dhc64C6-10/Dhc64C8-1 0.71 ± 0.03 3.98 ± 0.19 18.7
Dhc64C6-10/+ 0.60 ± 0.03 5.90 ± 0.32 12.7
Dhc64C8-1/+ 0.71 ± 0.04 3.94 ± 0.23 16.7
Gl 1/+ 0.65 ± 0.04 4.90 ± 0.30 13.7

Droplet motion in phase II embryos was characterized by centroid tracking. Pauses after minus-end or plus-end travel were recognized automatically by custom software and quantitated as described previously (Gross et al., 2000; Materials and methods). (First column) Average pause duration. (Second column) Time between pauses, a measure for how frequently pauses occur. (Third column) Fraction of reversals associated with a pause. This parameter indicates whether droplets typically pause first before reversing travel direction. In all cases, a majority of reversals occurs without a detectable pause. The data in rows labeled (*) are from our previous analysis of droplet travel (Gross et al., 2000) and are included for comparison.