Skip to main content
. 1998 Sep 29;95(20):11927–11932. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.20.11927

Table 1.

Strand asymmetry of CpG transitions in p53 genes: Gene resolution

CpG transition class
Silent CpG transitions
 Germ line p53 retropseudogenes
p53 genes in human tumors*
Nonsilent CpG transitions
 Germinal, including Li–Flaumeni syndrome
 Singlets in human tumors
 Multiplets in human tumors
 Multiplets with silent hitchhikers
p53 doublets composed of nonsilent CpG  transitions ↓ Homostrand C → T, C → T ↘↙ Heterostrand C → T, G → A ↓ Homostrand G → A, G → A
 All cancers in databases (13, 20) 5 26 6
 Colorectal and skin cancers 4 4 2
 All but colorectal and skin cancers§ 1 22 4
*

Although the sample size is too small for reliable statistical inference, the observed ratio (6 C → T:12 G → A) fits the expected ratio of 1:2 (Td hypothesis) much better than 1:1 (Rd hypothesis). 

Three multiplets from “p53 late” colorectal cancers are excluded. Similarly, although the sample size is too small, the observed data do not fit the 1:1 ratio predicted by the Rd hypothesis. 

A nonparametric goodness of fit test was performed to ascertain the significance of the deviation from 1:2:1 ratio predicted by the Rd hypothesis. It was found significant at the 93.6% level (0.064 P value), an almost significant deviation from the 1:2:1 ratio. 

§

Same, with 0.005 P value (indicating highly significant deviation from the 1:2:1 ratio).