Table 1.
Strand asymmetry of CpG transitions in p53 genes: Gene resolution
CpG transition class | ||
---|---|---|
Silent CpG transitions | ||
Germ line p53 retropseudogenes | ||
p53 genes in human tumors* | ||
Nonsilent CpG transitions | ||
Germinal, including Li–Flaumeni syndrome | ||
Singlets in human tumors | ||
Multiplets in human tumors | ||
Multiplets with silent hitchhikers† |
p53 doublets composed of nonsilent CpG transitions | ↓ Homostrand C → T, C → T | ↘↙ Heterostrand C → T, G → A | ↓ Homostrand G → A, G → A |
---|---|---|---|
All cancers in databases (13, 20)‡ | 5 | 26 | 6 |
Colorectal and skin cancers | 4 | 4 | 2 |
All but colorectal and skin cancers§ | 1 | 22 | 4 |
Although the sample size is too small for reliable statistical inference, the observed ratio (6 C → T:12 G → A) fits the expected ratio of 1:2 (Td hypothesis) much better than 1:1 (Rd hypothesis).
Three multiplets from “p53 late” colorectal cancers are excluded. Similarly, although the sample size is too small, the observed data do not fit the 1:1 ratio predicted by the Rd hypothesis.
A nonparametric goodness of fit test was performed to ascertain the significance of the deviation from 1:2:1 ratio predicted by the Rd hypothesis. It was found significant at the 93.6% level (0.064 P value), an almost significant deviation from the 1:2:1 ratio.
Same, with 0.005 P value (indicating highly significant deviation from the 1:2:1 ratio).