Skip to main content
. 2007 Jun 8;115(Suppl 1):129–136. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9361

Table 3.

Relative gene expression measured by quantitative real-time RT-PCR.

Relative expression levels in MCF-7 cells
Treatment P21WAF1/CIP1 BCL-2 BAX
Experiment 1 (mean ± SD, n = 5)
 Control 1 (c) 1 (c) 1 (c)
 10−8 M B[a]P 1.2 ± 0.4 0.9 ± 0.3 1.1 ± 0.2
 10−9 M E2 0.6 ± 0.1 0.9 ± 0.3 1.2 ± 0.2
 Binary mixture 0.9 ± 0.2 0.9 ± 0.3 0.6 ± 0.6
Experiment 2
 Control 1 (c) 1 (c) 1 (c)
 10−6 M B[a]P 36.1 0.2 1.5
 10−9 M E2 1.0 1.3 1.3
 Binary mixture 35.5 0.1 1.4
Experiment 3
 Control 1 (c) 1 (c) 1 (c)
 10−8 M B[a]P 1.1 1.3 1.0
 10−11 M lindane 0.7 1.2 1.0
 Binary mixture 0.9 1.0 1.0
Experiment 4
 Control 1 (c) 1 (c) 1 (c)
 10−6 M B[a]P 56.3 0.3 2.1
 10−11 M lindane 1.9 2.0 2.9
 Binary mixture 47.9 0.3 2.2
Experiment 5
 Control 1 (c) 1 (c) 1 (c)
 0.5 μM PhIP 1.4 1.2 1.4
 10−9 M E2 0.8 1.0 1.6
 Binary mixture 0.6 0.7 1.1
(c)

calibrator, which for the purposes of these experiments were untreated controls. Relative gene expression levels following 24-hr treatment in the presence or absence of test agents, as indicated. Reverse transcription of total RNA and subsequent amplification was carried out using primers as described in “Materials and Methods.” Within each experiment, reactions were performed in triplicate and “no-template” controls were included. Averaged threshold cycle (CT) values for each reaction were normalized to β-ACTIN values thus giving ΔCT values. Alterations in gene expression were determined by comparing treatment groups with the calibrator, giving ΔΔCT values. Finally, relative gene expression was calculated using the formula 2−ΔΔCT.