Table 4.
Construct validity for excellence | Measurement validity | ||
Research | Education | ||
Shanghai | |||
Alumni, Nobel/Fields | - | - | ++ |
Faculty, Nobel/Fields | +++ | + | ++ |
Faculty, highly-cited | ++ | + | + |
Nature/Science articles | ++ | - | +++ |
Number of articles | - | - | + |
Size | - | - | - |
Times | |||
Peer opinion | +++ | +++ | - |
Graduate recruiter opinion | - | + | - |
International faculty | + | + | ? |
International students | - | + | ? |
Student-faculty ratio | - | + | ? |
Citations per faculty | ++ | - | + |
Other rankings | |||
Web presence | + | + | + |
Funding | + | - | + |
-, Poor; +, low/modest; ++, good; +++, very good; ?, unknown (insufficient detail provided on the reliability of databases).