Skip to main content
. 2007 Nov 15;35(21):e148. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm918

Table 1.

Raw resequencing results for F. tularensis LVS query against F. tularensis LVS reference

Expt. No. Array Bases/array Bases called Call cate (%) SNPs % SNPs of called bases True–positive SNPs (expected/detected)
007 A 301 470 300 490 99.675 49 0.016 0/0
B 302 018 297 231 98.415 23 0.008 0/0
C 301 394 296 530 98.386 27 0.009 0/0
D 296 905 291 127 98.054 33 0.011 0/0
E 290 100 282 102 97.243 18 0.006 1/1
F 234 779 227 722 96.994 17 0.007 2/2
Total 1 726 666 1 695 202 98.178 167 0.010 3/3
013 A 301 470 300 267 99.601 54 0.018 0/0
B 302 018 296 718 98.245 25 0.008 0/0
C 301 394 296 372 98.334 29 0.010 0/0
D 296 905 290 472 97.833 32 0.011 0/0
E 290 100 284 220 97.973 20 0.007 1/1
F 234 779 229 583 97.787 17 0.007 2/2
Total 1 726 666 1 697 632 98.318 177 0.010 3/3

The results shown are for the LVS sample, using the Affymetrix-recommended batch analysis parameters, including a quality score threshold of 12 and a call rate cutoff of 0.5. Those portions of chip F that represent the SCHU S4 reference and the plasmids were excluded from this analysis. Therefore, this represents the performance of the system under ideal circumstances: the chips are challenged with a sample that is essentially identical to the chip reference.