Table 2.
Pairwise genetic differentiation among H. pachinus, H. cydno, H. melpomene and H. hecale from Costa Rica at 16 sequenced loci. (Comparisons between the putative hybrid species, H. pachinus, and each of the suspected parental species, H. cydno and H. melpomene, are listed first for each locus. Of these two, the comparison exhibiting the least differentiation is given in bold. There was no differentiation among species at the locus white (w), so no comparison is given in bold.)
| locus | comparison | FST | probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| ap | cydno versus pachinus | 0.246 | 0.021 |
| melpomene versus pachinus | 0.479 | 0.000 | |
| cydno versus melpomene | 0.546 | 0.000 | |
| cydno versus hecale | 0.950 | 0.031 | |
| pachinus versus hecale | 0.886 | 0.031 | |
| melpomene versus hecale | 1.000 | 0.024 | |
| overall | 0.785 | 0.000 | |
| ci | cydno versus pachinus | −0.074 | 0.854 |
| melpomene versus pachinus | 0.107 | 0.096 | |
| cydno versus melpomene | 0.129 | 0.041 | |
| cydno versus hecale | 0.100 | 0.104 | |
| pachinus versus hecale | 0.122 | 0.102 | |
| melpomene versus hecale | 0.117 | 0.128 | |
| overall | 0.090 | 0.027 | |
| cn | cydno versus pachinus | −0.008 | 0.625 |
| melpomene versus pachinus | 0.208 | 0.078 | |
| cydno versus melpomene | 0.357 | 0.029 | |
| cydno versus hecale | 0.760 | 0.999 | |
| pachinus versus hecale | 0.729 | 0.999 | |
| melpomene versus hecale | 0.864 | 0.999 | |
| overall | 0.443 | 0.002 | |
| CO | cydno versus pachinus | 0.686 | 0.000 |
| melpomene versus pachinus | 0.911 | 0.000 | |
| cydno versus melpomene | 0.852 | 0.000 | |
| cydno versus hecale | 0.910 | 0.000 | |
| pachinus versus hecale | 0.954 | 0.000 | |
| melpomene versus hecale | 0.973 | 0.003 | |
| overall | 0.818 | 0.000 | |
| Dll | cydno versus pachinus | 0.109 | 0.000 |
| melpomene versus pachinus | 0.500 | 0.000 | |
| cydno versus melpomene | 0.485 | 0.000 | |
| cydno versus hecale | 0.757 | 0.000 | |
| pachinus versus hecale | 0.771 | 0.000 | |
| melpomene versus hecale | 0.429 | 0.000 | |
| overall | 0.542 | 0.000 | |
| dpp | cydno versus pachinus | −0.031 | 0.711 |
| melpomene versus pachinus | 0.083 | 0.445 | |
| cydno versus melpomene | 0.006 | 0.726 | |
| cydno versus hecale | 0.941 | 0.024 | |
| pachinus versus hecale | 0.760 | 0.006 | |
| melpomene versus hecale | 0.946 | 0.005 | |
| overall | 0.703 | 0.000 | |
| Ef1α | cydno versus pachinus | 0.345 | 0.037 |
| melpomene versus pachinus | 0.764 | 0.009 | |
| cydno versus melpomene | 0.678 | 0.015 | |
| cydno versus hecale | 0.671 | 0.063 | |
| pachinus versus hecale | 0.852 | 0.050 | |
| melpomene versus hecale | 0.706 | 0.055 | |
| overall | 0.679 | 0.000 | |
| en | cydno versus pachinus | −0.179 | 0.848 |
| melpomene versus pachinus | 0.462 | 0.008 | |
| cydno versus melpomene | 0.512 | 0.009 | |
| cydno versus hecale | 0.751 | 0.004 | |
| pachinus versus hecale | 0.724 | 0.001 | |
| melpomene versus hecale | 0.926 | 0.000 | |
| overall | 0.671 | 0.000 | |
| inv | cydno versus pachinus | 0.448 | 0.002 |
| melpomene versus pachinus | 0.631 | 0.000 | |
| cydno versus melpomene | 0.595 | 0.000 | |
| cydno versus hecale | 0.478 | 0.000 | |
| pachinus versus hecale | 0.509 | 0.000 | |
| melpomene versus hecale | 0.567 | 0.000 | |
| overall | 0.537 | 0.000 | |
| Mpi | cydno versus pachinus | 0.188 | 0.040 |
| melpomene versus pachinus | 0.365 | 0.004 | |
| cydno versus melpomene | −0.045 | 0.575 | |
| cydno versus hecale | 0.193 | 0.081 | |
| pachinus versus hecale | 0.502 | 0.000 | |
| melpomene versus hecale | 0.258 | 0.015 | |
| overall | 0.259 | 0.002 | |
| ptc | cydno versus pachinus | 0.218 | 0.011 |
| melpomene versus pachinus | 0.832 | 0.002 | |
| cydno versus melpomene | 0.620 | 0.004 | |
| cydno versus hecale | 0.877 | 0.000 | |
| pachinus versus hecale | 0.964 | 0.000 | |
| melpomene versus hecale | 0.926 | 0.002 | |
| overall | 0.850 | 0.000 | |
| sd | cydno versus pachinus | 0.097 | 0.132 |
| melpomene versus pachinus | 0.485 | 0.000 | |
| cydno versus melpomene | 0.216 | 0.000 | |
| cydno versus hecale | 0.659 | 0.000 | |
| pachinus versus hecale | 0.874 | 0.000 | |
| melpomene versus hecale | 0.874 | 0.000 | |
| overall | 0.690 | 0.000 | |
| st | cydno versus pachinus | 0.019 | 0.280 |
| melpomene versus pachinus | 0.260 | 0.009 | |
| cydno versus melpomene | 0.126 | 0.095 | |
| cydno versus hecale | 0.722 | 0.000 | |
| pachinus versus hecale | 0.787 | 0.000 | |
| melpomene versus hecale | 0.655 | 0.000 | |
| overall | 0.591 | 0.000 | |
| Tpi | cydno versus pachinus | −0.010 | 0.306 |
| melpomene versus pachinus | 0.420 | 0.000 | |
| cydno versus melpomene | 0.354 | 0.000 | |
| cydno versus hecale | 0.867 | 0.004 | |
| pachinus versus hecale | 0.880 | 0.005 | |
| melpomene versus hecale | 0.962 | 0.004 | |
| overall | 0.682 | 0.000 | |
| w | cydno versus pachinus | −0.004 | 0.637 |
| melpomene versus pachinus | −0.074 | 0.503 | |
| cydno versus melpomene | 0.125 | 0.088 | |
| cydno versus hecale | 0.174 | 0.093 | |
| pachinus versus hecale | −0.034 | 0.418 | |
| melpomene versus hecale | 0.066 | 0.224 | |
| overall | 0.044 | 0.253 | |
| wg | cydno versus pachinus | 0.277 | 0.002 |
| melpomene versus pachinus | 0.680 | 0.003 | |
| cydno versus melpomene | 0.578 | 0.000 | |
| cydno versus hecale | 0.503 | 0.000 | |
| pachinus versus hecale | 0.616 | 0.003 | |
| melpomene versus hecale | 0.679 | 0.005 | |
| overall | 0.534 | 0.000 |