Table 1.
Terms used
Symbols | Description | |
---|---|---|
fA | Ratio of FRET complexes over total acceptor, considering intact fluorophores only (Eq. 26). | |
fD | Ratio of FRET complexes over total donor, considering intact fluorophores only (Eq. 26). | |
fa | Fraction of acceptor-type molecules participating in complexes, irrespective of their labeling state (Eq. 34). | |
fd | Fraction of donor-type molecules participating in complexes, irrespective of their labeling state (Eq. 33). | |
[A] | Concentration of free acceptor fluorophores (Eq. 6). | |
[D] | Concentration of free donor fluorophores (Eq. 6). | |
[DA] | Concentration of complexes carrying both intact donor and acceptor fluorophore (Eq. 6). | |
[a], [d], [da] | Chemical concentrations of free acceptor, free donor, and complexes, irrespective of their labeling state (Eqs. 28–30). | |
[Aref] | Concentration of intact acceptor fluorophore in the calibration samples (Eq. 2). | |
[Dref] | Concentration of intact donor fluorophore in the calibration samples (Eq. 1). | |
[At] | Total concentration of labeled acceptors with intact fluorophore (Eq. 22). | |
[Dt] | Total concentration of labeled donor with intact fluorophore (Eq. 21). | |
[at],[ dt] | Total chemical concentrations of acceptor and donor (Eqs. 31 and 32). | |
Rt | Ratio of total abundances of labeled acceptor over total abundances of labeled donors (Eq. 27). | |
pa, pd | Probabilities, by which a given molecule of type a and d is labeled with an intact fluorophore (Eq. 28). | |
pa,tc, pd,tc | Labeling probabilities of donors and acceptors within the tandem construct (Eq. 35). | |
Abbreviation for pdpa,tc/pd,tc (see above). | ||
αi | Apparent relative acceptor concentrations* (Eq. 13). | |
δi | Apparent relative donor concentrations* (Eq. 12). | |
Fi(λ) | Measured spectrum (linear combination of and ) (Eq. 6; see also Eq. 9). | |
Reference fluorescence emission spectra of pure acceptor* (Eq. 2). | ||
Reference fluorescence emission spectra of pure donor* (Eq. 1). | ||
rex,i | Scaling factor reflecting the excitation ratios of two fluorophores at the given excitation wavelength (Eq. 3). | |
E | Characteristic FRET efficiency (Eq. 6). | |
ETC | FRET efficiency of the tandem construct. | |
K | Dissociation constant (Eq. 47). | |
Extinction coefficients of acceptor and donor* (Eqs. 1 and 2). | ||
QA, QD | Quantum yields of acceptor and donor (Eqs. 1 and 2). | |
ɛA(λ), ɛD(λ) | Standard emission spectra of the two fluorophores normalized to unit area (Eq. 3). | |
Ii,ref | Excitation intensity* (Eq. 1). | |
ηi(λ) | Detection efficiencies of the instrument used* (Eq. 1). | |
B | Bleaching ratio (Eq. 53). | |
Apparent relative donor concentration before and after acceptor bleaching (Eqs. 51 and 52). | ||
Donor fluorescence intensities before and after photobleaching the acceptor (Eq. 60). | ||
Averages over the emission range k of standard (literature) emission spectra of acceptor and donor (Eq. 61). | ||
Reference reading of the acceptor and donor sample* at emission channel k. |
Note that index i refers to two excitation wavelengths λi (i = 1,2).