Skip to main content
. 2008 Feb 1;94(3):803–819. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.107.112623

Table 3.

Distances between EGF molecules and interface parameters in models of possible EGFR oligomers generated from available EGFR crystal structures

EGFR interface Crystal structure used Distance between ligands* (Å) Effect of addition of dye to distance Surface area (Å2) ΔG§ (kcal/mol) (p-value)
Back-to-back 1mox (12) 111 Increase 1107 −17.3 (0.043)
Head-to-head 1mox (12) 50 Decrease (min 27 Å) 440 −3.1 (0.430)
Back-to-back 1ivo (13) 111 Increase 1315 −14.0 (0.132)
Weak A:A 1ivo (13) 64 Increase 455 0.3 (0.559)
Weak B:B 1ivo (13) 46 Decrease 284 1.0 (0.749)
Head-to-back§ 1nql (15) 53 Similar 956 −9.9 (0.263)
Domain II/IV interactions 1nql (15) 68 Similar 655 −5.7 (0.366)
Perpendicular 1yy9 (73) 816 −5.0 (0.417)
HER3 conformation 1m6b (64) 1877 −21.0 (0.061)
*

Distances between EGF or TGFα molecules are from the first determined amino acid residues (residues 2/3 in 1mox and residue 5 in 1ivo).

Size of Cy3 or Cy5 dye used is ∼20 Å.

Calculated by PISA (53).

§

ΔG is the solvation free energy gain upon formation of the interface, as calculated by PISA. It does not include the effect of satisfied hydrogen bonds and salt bridges across the interface. The p-value is the probability of getting a lower than obtained ΔG, if interface atoms are picked randomly from the protein surface.

Inactive crystallographic dimer.

Crystal of unliganded HER3 dimer.