Skip to main content
. 1999 May 11;96(10):5372–5377. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.10.5372

Table 1.

Comparison of capillary-based vs. chip-based SDS/CGE for nonspecifically labeled proteinsa

graphic file with name pq10909530t1.jpg

a Calculated from Figs. 2 and 3. All calculations were based on standard equations (27). 

b For peaks 3 and 4, the resolution was calculated by using the expression R = 2 × (t3t4)/(Δt1/2,3 + Δt1/2,4), where t3 and t4 are the migration times of peaks 3 and 4 and Δt1/2,3 and Δt1/2,4 are the respective full widths at half maximum. 

c Theoretical plate numbers (N) were calculated for peaks 2 and 5. These calculations were based on the measured full width at half maximum (Δt1/2) of a peak by using the expression N = 5.54 × (tt1/2)2, where t is the migration time. 

d Plate heights (H) are calculated by dividing the column length by the theoretical plate numbers. For CE-based separations, a column length of 20 cm was used. For chip-based separations, a column length of 4.5 cm was used. 

e Theoretical plates per second (N/s) were calculated by dividing theoretical plate numbers (N) by migration time.