Table 4.
Studies Evaluating BM Derivation of Liver Endothelium After Transplantation
Study | Species | Percentage of BM-Derived LSECs | Techniques Used | Microscopy | LSEC Marker | BM Marker |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gao et al.36 | Human, mouse | Identified, not quantified | X-Y mismatched sex, IHC | Light | Factor VIII | Y,X chromosome |
Ng et al.37 | Human | <1% | X-Y mismatched sex, IHC | Epifluorescence | CD31 | Y,X chromosome |
Hove et al.38 | Human | Identified, not quantified | X-Y mismatched sex, recipient HLA, IHC | Light, IHC | Factor VIII | Y,X chromosome |
Pons et al.39 | Human | 51 ± 8.28 | X-Y mismatched sex, FISH | Epifluorescence | vWF | Y,X chromosome |
Present study | Rat | 2%–5% | WT graft to EGFP recipient, mismatched recipient MHC | Confocal immunofluorescence, immuno-SEM, flow cytometry | SE-1 fenestrations | Recipient MHC class, EGFP |
Abbreviation: IHC, immunohistochemistry.