Skip to main content
. 2001 Jun 11;153(6):1287–1300. doi: 10.1083/jcb.153.6.1287

Table 2.

Diffusion Coefficients and Mobility of CLIMP-63 Constructs

Constructs D Mobility n
10−10 cm2s−1
wt-GFP 1.5 ± 0.4 + 5
Δlumen-GFP 8.6 ± 3.3 +++ 6
Δ24–101-GFP 3.1 ± 2.1 + 12
Δ24–101Δlumen-GFP 13.7 ± 2.2 +++ 4
GFP-Δcytoplasmic 8.9 ± 2.4 ++ 9
GFP-Δcytoplasmic double luminal 2.7 ± 1.2 4
GFP-Δcytoplasmic-Δ511–601 7.8 ± 4.2 ++ 5
GFP-Δcytoplasmic-Δ428–601 16.4 ± 8.2 +++ 4
GFP-Δcytoplasmic-Δ354–601 17.8 ± 2.7 +++ 5
GFP-Δcytoplasmic-Δ218–601 17.8 ± 4.9 +++ 5
GFP-Δcytoplasmic-Δ246–492 6.7 ± 2.5 ++ 8
GFP-Δcytoplasmic-Δ132–354 10.8 ± 5.5 +++ 6
P450 2C2-GFP 13.1 ± 6.6 +++ 6
Sec61β-GFP 7.8 ± 1.2 +++ 6
VSV-G-GFP 5.9 ± 1.3 +++ 5

FRAP analysis of GFP fusion constructs reveal strong influence of the luminal segment on diffusion. Deletion of the luminal segment increases diffusion and mobility (Δlumen-GFP) in contrast to deletion of the microtubule binding domain (Δ24–101-GFP), which increases diffusion but not mobility. Note that deletions of the COOH-terminal part have a higher diffusion coefficient. D, diffusion coefficient; n, number of independent experiments. Mobility is measured as a percentage of initial fluorescence: 0–25%, −; 25–50%,+; 50–75%, ++; 75–100%, +++.