Skip to main content
. 1999 Feb 1;189(3):553–562. doi: 10.1084/jem.189.3.553

Table I.

Study Design

Groups Treatment/ genotype Start of treat- ment Challenge Termina- tion of experi- ment
d h
Experiment I
  1 IgG −2 SAL ×2  8
  2 mAb NK1.1 −2 SAL ×2  8
  3 IgG −2 OVA ×2  8
  4 mAb NK1.1 −2 OVA ×2  8
  5 IgG −2 SAL ×7  8
  6 mAb NK1.1 −2 SAL ×7  8
  7 IgG −2 OVA ×7  8
  8 mAb NK1.1 −2 OVA ×7  8
Experiment II
  9 IgG −2 OVA ×7  8
 10 mAb NK1.1 −2 OVA ×7  8
 11 mAb NK1.1 −7 OVA ×7  8
 12 IgG   13 OVA ×7  8
 13 mAb NK1.1   13 OVA ×7  8
 14 IgG −2 OVA ×7 30
 15 mAb NK1.1 −2 OVA ×7 30
Experiment III
 16 Wild-type  (CD1+/+) OVA ×7  8
 17 CD1d1 mutant  (CD1−/−) OVA ×7  8
Experiment IV
 18 Wild-type SAL ×7 24
 19 Wild-type OVA ×7 24
 20 γ/δ T cell–  deficient OVA ×7 24

Four independent experiments were performed and are shown separately. All mice were immunized with OVA on day 0.