Skip to main content
. 1999 May 3;189(9):1497–1506. doi: 10.1084/jem.189.9.1497

Figure 1.

Figure 1

SR-A–deficient and –sufficient AMs bind TiO2 equally. (A) Representative photomicrograph showing approximately similar binding of particles by SR-A–deficient (SR−/−) and wild-type (SR+/+) AMs incubated with unopsonized TiO2 (original magnification 400). (B) SR−/− and SR+/+ AMs were pretreated with the SR blocker PI or the control polyanion CS or left untreated, and their binding of TiO2 was determined by flow cytometry. (C) SR−/− and SR+/+ AMs show similar binding of TiO2 in vivo as determined by intratracheal instillation of TiO2 followed by BAL and flow cytometric analysis. TiO2 binding is expressed as increase in flow cytometric RAS. The data represent the mean (± SEM) of three separate experiments (B) and three mice per treated group compared with one control (C). *Significantly different from TiO2 alone, P < 0.006.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure