TABLE 2.

Summary of experiments

Expt no.	Strain	Growth statusa	Probe pairsb	% Nuclei with d > 0	% Nuclei with single signals	d = 0 inside 90% confidence interval before and after correction for 10% signal loss		Corresponding figure(s)
						Before	After
1	FKY74	Stat	3T-4T	59	4.5	No	No	Fig. 4c
2	FKY74	Stat	3T-11T	42	5.5	Yes	Yes	Fig. 4c
3	SK1	Stat	7B-7B′	65	14.0	No	No
4	FKY74	Stat	7B-7B′	48	7.0	No	Yes
5	W303	Stat	7B-7B′	54	1.5	No	No
6	FKY74	Stat	7B′-16B	57	8.5	No	No
7	W303	Stat	7B′-16B	35	5.0	Yes	Noc
8	FKY74	Stat	7B′-16B	61	11.5	No	No
9	W303	Stat	7B-16B	50	4.5	No	Yes
10	SK1	Stat	7A-7A′	56	6.5	No	No
11	FKY74	Stat	7A-7A′	45	3.0	Yes	Yes
12	W303	Stat	7A-7A′	50	8.0	No	Yes	Fig. 5 and 8
13	FKY74	Stat	7A′-16A	53	6.5	No	Yes	Fig. 5 and 8
14	W303	Stat	7A′-16A	61	14.0	No	No
15	SK1	Exp	7A-16A	55	6.0	No	No
16	FKY74	Exp	7A-16A	42	5.5	Yes	Yes
17	W303	Exp	7A-16A	44	7.0	Yes	Yes
18	SK1	Stat	7A-16A	48	5.0	No	Yes
19	FKY74	Stat	7A-16A	48	10.5	No	Yes
20	W303	Stat	7A-16A	56	11.0	No	No
21	FKY74	Stat	7A-12Ad	87	10.5	No	No	Fig. 6
22	W303	Stat	7A-12Ad	70	6.5	No	No	Fig. 6
23	SK1	Spor 0 he	7A-16A	65	21.5	No	No	Fig. 7a
24	SK1	Spor 2 h	7A-16A	70	31.0	No	No	Fig. 7a
25	SK1	Spor 3 h	7A-16A	82	27.0	No	No	Fig. 7a
26	SK1	Spor 4 h	7A-16A	82	27.5	No	No	Fig. 7a
27	AMP115	Spor 0 he	7A-16A	44	4.5	Yes	Yes	Fig. 7b
28	AMP115	Spor 2 h	7A-16A	52	7.5	No	Yes	Fig. 7b
29	AMP115	Spor 3 h	7A-16A	51	5.5	No	Yes	Fig. 7b
30	AMP115	Spor 4 h	7A-16A	46	8.5	Yes	Yes	Fig. 7b
31	AMP115	Spor 24 h	7A-16A	43	6.0	Yes	Yes	Fig. 7b
32	FKY74	Stat	7A-16A	52	8.0	Yes	Yes	Fig. 9

^aGrowth status of the culture from which cells were measured. Stat, Stationary growing culture; Exp, exponentially growing culture; Spor, cells in sporulation for the period indicated.

^bTested pairs of loci as shown in Fig. 1.

^cAfter correction there is a smaller percentage of nuclei with d > 0 than in 90% of the runs of the simulation.

^dNOR-linked probe.

^eCells in presporulation medium.