Skip to main content
. 2001 Aug 6;154(3):611–618. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200105079

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Transverse sections (z-sections) of 3-D reconstructions. (a) F-actin control. Because adjacent actin monomers are staggered by ∼1/2 × 55 Å, sectioning the reconstruction through the widest part of one actin (monomer on the right) results in sectioning through a narrower part of the adjacent one (on the left); outer and inner domains are marked Ao and Ai on each. (b) F-actin–MLCK-147; note the extra density (arrow) due to MLCK on the extreme periphery of the map bridging inner and outer domains of the two actin monomers sectioned. (c) Maps in a and b were compared, and the difference between the two (filled black region) was superimposed on a copy of the F-actin map. The difference densities, attributable to the bound MLCK, were statistically significant at >99.95% confidence levels. This analysis also showed that the protein-free pore between the MLCK density and F-actin (* in b; cross-hatching in c) was negatively significant, as if decorated filaments drew in extra stain in this region. Sections shown are at the same axial position and have the same relative orientation. The average phase residual (Ψ ± SD), a measurement of the geometrical agreement among filaments generating reconstructions, was 54.0 ± 5.9° for the F-actin–MLCK-147 data. The average up–down phase residual (ΔΨ ± SD), a measure of filament polarity, was 23.7 ± 8.5°. The two values were comparable to those previously obtained.