Skip to main content
. 1997 Oct 6;186(7):1059–1075. doi: 10.1084/jem.186.7.1059

Table 3.

Influence of I-Ab,I-Ak, I-Aq, and H2nb1 MHC Class II Molecules on 4.1 Thymocyte Development

Percentage of cells* Ratios* IDDM (n) Insulitis score (n)
n Organ CD4+CD8(Vβ11+) CD4+CD8+ CD4CD8 CD4CD8+ CD4+/ DN CD4+/CD8+
x ± SD x ± SD
(NOD × B6) F1 29 T 15 ± 5a (67 ± 7)    53 ± 10  27 ± 9 4 ± 3     0.6 ± 0.2s  0 (10)ae 0.42 ± 0.81 (10)ak
S 12 ± 6 (78 ± 12)      –  84 ± 8 4 ± 2  2.9 ± 1.5y
(NOD × I-Ab−B6) F1 9 T 36 ± 5b (93 ± 3)    37 ± 9  23 ± 4o 4 ± 1 1.6 ± 0.2t  0 (15)af 1.59 ± 0.45 (10)al
S 12 ± 6c (86 ± 11)      –  86 ± 7 2 ± 1  4.6 ± 1.4z
NOD 9 T 30 ± 7d (94 ± 2)e    53 ± 9  13 ± 4p 4 ± 2 2.2 ± 0.6u 30 (40)ag 3.74 ± 0.15 (4)am
S 24 ± 4f (88 ± 4)g      –    72 ± 5 4 ± 1 8.7 ± 2.9aa
NOD.H-2g7/I-Ak 7 T 25 ± 3 (93 ± 1)    49 ± 5  21 ± 3q 5 ± 1  1.2 ± 0.2v  0 (9)ah  2.2 ± 0.8 (7)an
S  6 ± 1h (90 ± 1)      –  92 ± 1 2 ± 1  2.9 ± 0.3ab
NOD.H-2g7/q 7 T 19 ± 3i (88 ± 3)    59 ± 5  19 ± 3 3 ± 1    1.0 ± 0.2w  0 (7)ai  0.7 ± 0.4 (7)ao
S 11 ± 8j (87 ± 4)      – 86 ± 10 3 ± 2 2.9 ± 1.4ac
NOD.H-2g7/nb1 11 T 11 ± 3k (37 ± 9)l    52 ± 7  34 ± 5r 3 ± 1 0.3 ± 0.1x  0 (11)aj  0.1 ± 0.1 (7)ap
S  6 ± 2m (51 ± 16)n      –  91 ± 4 2 ± 1  2.9 ± 0.4ad

Mice were studied at 3–5 ( 

*

) or at 10 wk ( 

) of age. Flow cytometry was done as indicated in the legend to Fig. 1. DN, double-negative cells (CD4CD8); T, thymus; S, spleen. Statistics (Mann-Whitney U test): CD4+CD8: a versus b, P <0.0001; c versus f, P <0.003; h versus f, P <0.0009; i versus d, P <0.0001; j versus f, P <0.005; k versus d, P <0.0002; m versus f, P <0.0002; CD4+CD8Vβ11+: 1 versus e, P <0.0002; n versus g, P <0.0002; CD4CD8: o versus p, P <0.03; q versus p, P <0.015; r versus p, P <0.0002; CD4+/DN: s versus t, P <0.0001; u versus v, P <0.03; w versus u, P <0.002; x versus u, P <0.0002; CD4+/CD8+: y versus z, P <0.015; z versus aa, P <0.002; ab versus aa, P <0.0009; ac versus aa, P <0.0002; ad versus aa, P <0.0002; IDDM: ad,ae,ah,ai,aj versus ag, P <0.0001; Insulitis Score: al versus ak, P <0.0006; ak versus am, P <0.0005; al versus am, P <0.005; an versus am, P <0.03; ao versus am, P <0.008; ap versus am, P <0.006.