Skip to main content
. 2006 May 11;16(3):339–346. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-0141-9

Table 2.

Evidence statements derived with respect to activity, work, and rehabilitation following spinal surgery

Evidence statement Direct evidencea Indirect evidenceb
There is strong evidence that encouragement of mobility and return to full activities as soon as possible after surgery produces better relief of pain, and an earlier return to work [6, 18, 32, 67] [32, 61]
There is strong evidence that early post-operative rehabilitation programmes improve activities of daily living. Rehabilitation programmes vary considerably, and it is not possible categorically to state which components in what intensity are the most effective [13, 16, 21, 3437, 45, 67] [2, 28, 32, 44, 53, 61]
There is strong evidence that early post-operative rehabilitation programmes improve return to work rates/times. Rehabilitation programmes vary considerably, and it is not possible categorically to state which components in what intensity are the most effective, though a focus on information about the course of disability and activity has been shown to be effective [13, 18, 3437, 45] [2, 32, 44, 53]
There is strong evidence that early post-operative return to work is generally advantageous, and some studies suggest it can be as early as 1 week (but that will depend on the nature of the work and the surgical procedure). A progressive return to previous duty is desirable. The same evidence indicates that early post-operative return to work is not detrimental (but that may depend on the nature of the work) [5, 6, 18, 35, 36] [13, 29, 57]
There is some direct evidence and considerable indirect evidence suggesting that early post-operative return to work specifically results in faster recovery and better clinical outcomes [16] [2, 13, 29, 32, 35, 36, 44, 53, 61, 67]
Work/exercise is good for physical and mental health [16, 3537, 44, 45]
Cohort studies show that return to work rates vary from less than 40% to more than 90%, with sickness absence times varying from as little as a day to over 12 months; the determinants include the type of procedure and the timing and nature of rehabilitation [5, 6, 17, 18]
The rate of recovery (both for clinical and vocational outcomes) is greatest in the first 3 months, with further improvement occurring more slowly [18, 65] [27, 50]
There is moderate evidence that patients’ expectations and satisfaction are important factors—recovery is facilitated by knowing what to expect [18, 51]
The concept of ‘let pain be your guide’ to guide reactivation is counterproductive [18, 43] [17]

aStudy (or review) specifically addressing the topic

bStudy (or review) having incidental findings impacting on the topic