Skip to main content
. 2001 Sep 30;42(3):377–389. doi: 10.1186/1751-0147-42-377

Table 2.

Relative risk (odds ratio) for trichostrongyle infections and the quantitative egg output in relation to different variables. Single regression model on ± trichostrongyle faecal egg positive animals. Differences between related figures are statistically significant (p < 0.05).

Categories, examined animals and variables Relative risk of infection EPG
Odds ratio 95% Cl Geometric mean

Lambing time
 Ewes soon after lambing
  Winter 1 - 13
  Spring 8.3 3.4 – 20.1 123
High EPG – values
 Ewes soon after lambing
  Haemonchus negative flocks 1 - 118
  Haemonchus positive flocks 26 10 – 71 776
Different sampling times in the same flocks
 Lambs in Sept. – Oct. 1 - 37
 Lambs in Nov. 5.0 2.8 – 8.7 213
Slaughtering time
 Lambs in Sept. – Oct.
  All lambs slaughtered before Dec. 1 1 - 10
  ≥ 1% of the lambs slaughtered after Dec 1. 3.9 2.5 – 6.1 83
Accommodation from birth to turn out in spring
 Lambs after appr. 4 weeks grazing
  Stable – new grazing area 1 - 3
  Stable – old grazing area 3.8 2.4 – 5.9 22
  Winter area – new grazing area 2.3 1.6 – 3.3 10
  Winter area – old grazing area 9.1 5.6 – 14.6 63
  Permanent outdoors 3.9 2.4 – 6.3 25
Pasture managament
 Ewes not dewormed
 Lambs after appr. 4 weeks grazing
  New grazing area 1 - 4
  Old grazing area 5.9 4.3 – 7.9 53
 Ewes dewormed before turn out
 Lambs after appr. 4 weeks grazing
  New grazing area 1 - 4
  Old grazing area 4.9 2.4 – 10.0 45
Lambs in Sept. – Oct.
  New spring grazing area + New autumn grazing area 1 - 8
  New spring grazing area + Old autumn grazing area 7.4 2.9 – 19.3 156