. 2007 Oct 22;7:197. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-7-197

Table 1.

Summary statistics for eight microsatellite loci and each population sample of Sardina pilchardus*

Locus name		N_A	N_S	H_E	Ho	F_IS
SAR1.5		41	22.03	0.944	0.834	0.158
SAR1.12		61	31.13	0.940	0.659	0.450
SAR2.18		41	24.72	0.949	0.775	0.009
SAR9		48	21.56	0.930	0.847	0.090
SAR19B3		60	28.84	0.956	0.562	0.403
SAR19B5		81	43.20	0.980	0.747	0.156
SARA2F		54	29.09	0.953	0.897	0.003
SARA3C		94	42.28	0.974	0.581	0.349

Location	N	N_A	N_S	H_E	Ho	F_IS

Dakhla	50	31.0	28.65	0.950	0.808	0.151
Tantan	47	30.7	28.58	0.950	0.775	0.187
Safi	50	29.4	26.55	0.948	0.742	0.219
Larache	50	29.4	27.20	0.951	0.682	0.285
Quarteira	47	27.4	25.99	0.944	0.728	0.232
Pasajes	49	30.0	28.15	0.953	0.726	0.240
Nador	47	29.2	27.08	0.946	0.726	0.234
Barcelona	45	27.5	26.45	0.944	0.692	0.269
Kavala	48	29.1	27.19	0.948	0.758	0.203

* N = population size; N_A= total number of alleles per locus and mean number of alleles per population, respectively; N_S= mean allelic richness standardized to the smallest sample size (42) using the rarefaction method of FSTAT 2.9.3 [66] per locus and population; mean expected (H_E) and observed (H_O) heterozygosities as well as mean F_IS= Wright's statistics per locus and population. Bold F_ISvalues are significant probability estimates after Bonferroni correction [69]