TABLE 4.
Data summary
URA3 | CAN1 | |
---|---|---|
Sequenced mutations | 237 | 227 |
Mutations at locus | 207 | 227 |
Fraction at locus | 0.87 | 1.00 |
Mutation rate to resistance | 5.43 | 15.2 |
Rate of loss of function of locus | 4.74 | 15.20 |
Nonsense mutations found | 64 | 70 |
Fraction of total mutations | 0.31 | 0.31 |
No. of unique nonsense mutations | 42 | 54 |
Fraction of possible unique nonsense mutations observed | 0.34 | 0.24 |
Missense mutations found | 103 | 80 |
Fraction of total mutations | 0.50 | 0.35 |
No. of unique missense mutations | 66 | 63 |
Insertion/deletion/other mutations found | 40 | 77 |
Fraction of total mutations | 0.19 | 0.34 |
Base pairs | 804 | 1773 |
Possible substitutions (bp × 3) | 2412 | 5319 |
Possible nonsense substitutions | 123 | 226 |
Possible nonsense substitutions leading to resistancea | 123 | 226 |
Fraction of nonsense substitutions leading to resistancea | 1 | 1 |
Possible missense substitutions | 2289 | 5093 |
Possible missense substitutions at URA3 leading to resistance | 193 | |
Possible missense substitutions at CAN1 leading to resistance | 264 | |
Fraction of missense substitutions leading to resistance | 0.08 | 0.05 |
Target size for loss of function via base pair substitution (bp) | 104 | 163 |
Target size for loss of function via insertion/deletion/otherb (bp) | 804 | 1773 |
Effective target size (bp) | 125 | 236 |
Phenotypic mutation rate (10−8) | 5.43 | 1.52 |
Mutation rate at locus (10−8) | 4.75 | 1.52 |
Mutation rate per base pair at locus (10−10) | 3.80 | 6.44 |
We assume that all nonsense mutations result in loss of function.
We assume that all insertion/deletion/other mutations result in loss of function; therefore the target size for these mutations is the size of the gene.