Skip to main content
. 2008 Jan;178(1):67–82. doi: 10.1534/genetics.107.071506

TABLE 4.

Data summary

URA3 CAN1
Sequenced mutations 237 227
Mutations at locus 207 227
Fraction at locus 0.87 1.00
Mutation rate to resistance 5.43 15.2
Rate of loss of function of locus 4.74 15.20
Nonsense mutations found 64 70
    Fraction of total mutations 0.31 0.31
    No. of unique nonsense mutations 42 54
    Fraction of possible unique nonsense mutations observed 0.34 0.24
Missense mutations found 103 80
    Fraction of total mutations 0.50 0.35
    No. of unique missense mutations 66 63
    Insertion/deletion/other mutations found 40 77
    Fraction of total mutations 0.19 0.34
Base pairs 804 1773
Possible substitutions (bp × 3) 2412 5319
Possible nonsense substitutions 123 226
    Possible nonsense substitutions leading to resistancea 123 226
    Fraction of nonsense substitutions leading to resistancea 1 1
Possible missense substitutions 2289 5093
    Possible missense substitutions at URA3 leading to resistance 193
    Possible missense substitutions at CAN1 leading to resistance 264
    Fraction of missense substitutions leading to resistance 0.08 0.05
Target size for loss of function via base pair substitution (bp) 104 163
Target size for loss of function via insertion/deletion/otherb (bp) 804 1773
Effective target size (bp) 125 236
Phenotypic mutation rate (10−8) 5.43 1.52
Mutation rate at locus (10−8) 4.75 1.52
Mutation rate per base pair at locus (10−10) 3.80 6.44
a

We assume that all nonsense mutations result in loss of function.

b

We assume that all insertion/deletion/other mutations result in loss of function; therefore the target size for these mutations is the size of the gene.