Skip to main content
Critical Care logoLink to Critical Care
. 2007 Apr 19;11(2):411. doi: 10.1186/cc5735

Acute renal failure in patients with sepsis

José António Lopes 1,, Sofia Jorge 1, Cristina Resina 1, Carla Santos 2, Álvaro Pereira 2, José Neves 2, Francisco Antunes 2, Mateus Martins Prata 1
PMCID: PMC2206468  PMID: 17466080

The evaluation of acute renal failure (ARF) by the newly developed classification for ARF (RIFLE, standing for 'risk, injury, failure, loss, end-stage kidney disease') [1] in patients with sepsis has not yet been performed. We evaluated, retrospectively, the incidence of ARF and its risk factors, therapy, and outcome among patients with sepsis admitted to the Infectious Diseases Intensive Care Unit of the Hospital de Santa Maria between January 2005 and December 2006. ARF was defined by means of the RIFLE classification [1]. Sepsis was classified in accordance with the American College of Chest Physicians and the Society of Critical Care Medicine consensus [2]. In all, 182 patients (aged 56.2 ± 18.56 years (mean ± SD), 120 male, 162 Caucasian) were analyzed. Baseline characteristics of the patients are summarized in Table 1. Sixty-eight patients (37.4%) had ARF. By multivariate analysis, age more than 60 years (odds ratio (OR) 0.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.17 to 0.87, P = 0.002), male (OR 5.5, 95% CI 2.2 to 13.5, P < 0.0001), chronic kidney disease (OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.79, P = 0.021), Gram-negative-related infection (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.89, P = 0.027), and a Simplified Acute Physiology Score, version II (SAPS II) > 50 (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.31, P < 0.0001) were independently associated with ARF. Thirteen patients (3 with injury and 10 with renal failure) had received renal replacement therapy (12 receiving continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration, and 1 receiving intermittent hemodialysis). The mortality rate was 37.4%, and increased from 'normal' to 'failure'. Patients who did not die had renal function recovery. Multivariate analysis including age more than 60 years, gender, SAPS II > 50, comorbidity (namely cardiovascular disease), and ARF showed that SAPS II > 50 (OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.29, P < 0.0001) and ARF (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.63, P = 0.003) were independent predictors of mortality.

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics

Variable No AKI Risk Injury Failure P
n 114 11 21 36
Age (years)a 54 ± 18.2 61.9 ± 20.9 61.6 ± 13.4 61.8 ± 16.3 NS
Sex (male) 65 (57) 10 (91) 18 (85.7) 27 (75) 0.009
Race (Caucasian) 102 (89.5) 10 (91) 20 (95.2) 30 (83.3) NS
Severe sepsisb 77 (67.5) 6 (54.5) 12 (57.1) 13 (36.1) 0.012
Septic shockb 25 (21.9) 4 (36.4) 8 (38) 23 (64) <0.0001
CVD 37 (32.4) 3 (27.3) 10 (47.6) 14 (38.9) NS
CKD 5 (43.9) 1 (9) 4 (19) 8 (22.2) 0.009
SAPS II > 50 22 (19.3) 6 (54.5) 7 (33.3) 9 (26.5) 0.06
Mortality 11 (9.6) 3 (27.3) 6 (28.6) 20 (55) <0.0001

Figures in parentheses are percentages. AKI, acute kidney injury; CKD, chronic kidney disease; CVD, cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus and hypertension; NS, not significant; SAPS II, Simplified Acute Physiology Score, version II. The SAPS II was calculated on the basis of the worst variables recorded during the first 24 hours of ICU admission. aMeans ± SD; bsepsis was classified in accordance with American College of Chest Physicians and the Society of Critical Care Medicine consensus [2].

Thus, ARF as determined by RIFLE is common among patients with sepsis, and increases mortality. Age, gender, chronic kidney disease, Gram-negative-related infection and severity of illness are independently associated with ARF in this setting.

Abbreviations

ARF = acute renal failure; CI = confidence interval; OR = odds ratio; RIFLE = risk, injury, failure, loss, end-stage kidney disease; SAPS II = Simplified Acute Physiology Score, version II.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

JAL, SJ, CR, and CS made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the study, to the acquisition of data, and to the analysis and interpretation of data. JAL, CR, AP, JN, FA, and MMP were involved in drafting the manuscript and revising it critically for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

References

  1. Bellomo R, Ronco C, Kellum JA, Mehta RL, Palevsky P, the ADQI workgroup Acute renal failure – definition, outcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and information technology needs: the Second International Consensus Conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) Group. Crit Care. 2004;8:R204–R212. doi: 10.1186/cc2872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Levy MM, Fink MP, Marshall JC, Abraham E, Angus D, Cook D, Cohen J, Opal SM, Vincent JL, Ramsay G, SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference. Crit Care Med. 2003;31:1250–1256. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000050454.01978.3B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Critical Care are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES