Skip to main content
. 2007 Jul 29;9(4):R48. doi: 10.1186/bcr1752

Table 3.

Association between centrosome amplification level and prognostic factors of breast carcinoma

Variable Cases (n) Centrosome amplification, mean ± standard deviation (%)

Structural P value Numerical P value
Tumor size
 ≤2 cm 40 4.01 ± 3.52 0.97 5.09 ± 3.05 0.50
 >2 cm 32 3.98 ± 2.98 4.65 ± 2.25
Nodal status
 Negative 37 4.17 ± 3.59 0.60 5.24 ± 2.99 0.26
 Positive 37 3.77 ± 2.88 4.53 ± 2.31
Histological grade
 Grade 1 12 4.03 ± 3.83 5.10 ± 1.90
 Grade 2 50 3.67 ± 3.07 0.69 5.08 ± 2.90 0.98
 Grade 3 10 5.26 ± 3.60 0.11 3.65 ± 2.35 0.13
ER status
 Positive 52 3.26 ± 2.82 0.003 5.31 ± 2.72 0.03
 Negative 23 5.60 ± 3.51 3.84 ± 2.30
PR status
 Positive 63 3.6 ± 2.8 0.056 5.17 ± 2.71 0.02
 Negative 12 6.2 ± 4.3 3.22 ± 1.74
HER2/neu overexpression
 Positive 14 6.09 ± 3.97 0.005 4.01 ± 2.08 0.19
 Negative 61 3.49 ± 2.84 5.05 ± 2.76
DNA ploidy
 Diploidy 7 5.21 ± 3.81 4.07 ± 2.13
 Aneuploidy 31 4.40 ± 3.59 0.59 5.10 ± 2.86 0.36
 Multiploidy 6 3.01 ± 3.62 0.40 5.37 ± 2.07 0.83