Abstract
Mutations in the GSF2 gene cause glucose starvation phenotypes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We have isolated the HXT1 gene, which encodes a low-affinity, high-capacity glucose transporter, as a multicopy suppressor of a gsf2 mutation. We show that gsf2 mutants accumulate Hxt1p in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and that Gsf2p is a 46-kDa integral membrane protein localized to the ER. gsf2 mutants also display a galactose growth defect and abnormal localization of the galactose transporter Gal2p but are not defective in function or localization of the high-affinity glucose transporter Hxt2p. These findings suggest that Gsf2p functions in the ER to promote the secretion of certain hexose transporters.
The HXT genes of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae encode a family of hexose transporters with diverse kinetic properties and patterns of expression (1–4). Transcription of the HXT genes is regulated by the concentration of glucose in the environment, and this transcriptional regulation is a principal mechanism whereby cells adapt to fluctuations in glucose availability. For example, when glucose is abundant, genes encoding low-affinity glucose transporters are induced while genes encoding high-affinity glucose transporters are repressed. When glucose is scarce, this pattern of HXT gene transcription is reversed such that high-affinity glucose transporters are expressed (5). The HXT1 gene encodes a major low-affinity, high-capacity glucose transporter (Km =100 mM) that is strongly induced in response to high levels of glucose (5–8). In this study, we have isolated HXT1 as a multicopy suppressor of mutations in GSF2 (glucose signaling factor).
The GSF2 gene was previously identified in a screen for mutants defective in signaling the presence of high glucose levels (9). GSF2 encodes a protein with a putative transmembrane domain and a C-terminal dilysine motif for retrieval of transmembrane proteins to the ER (see Fig. 2A; see also refs.9–11). In addition to relieving glucose repression of SUC2 and GAL10 transcription, gsf2 mutations cause a synthetic lethal phenotype in combination with snf1Δ, suggesting a functional relationship between GSF2 and SNF1. SNF1 encodes a protein–serine/threonine kinase that is required to relieve transcriptional repression of many genes in response to glucose depletion (12).
Here, we have isolated multicopy suppressors of the synthetic lethal phenotype of gsf2 and snf1 mutations. The recovery of HXT1 as a multicopy suppressor suggested a role for Gsf2p in glucose transporter function. We show that GSF2 encodes a 46-kDa integral membrane protein localized to the ER and that mutations in GSF2 lead to an accumulation of Hxt1p in the ER. These findings explain the glucose starvation and synthetic lethal phenotypes of gsf2 mutants. gsf2 mutations also affect the secretion of the galactose transporter Gal2p, but not the high-affinity glucose transporter Hxt2p. We suggest that Gsf2p functions in the ER to promote the secretion of certain hexose transporters.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Strains, Media, and Genetic Methods.
S. cerevisiae strains were PS350 (MATα his3-Δ200 leu2-Δ1 trp1-Δ63∷TRP1 ura3–52), PS352 (MATα his3-Δ200 leu2-Δ1 trp1-Δ63 ura3–52 gsf2-Δ2∷TRP1; isogenic to PS350), PS4343–11B [MATα his3-Δ200 leu2-Δ1 trp1-Δ1 ura3–52 gsf2–1 snf1-Δ10 (pSNF1-URA3, pSUC2∷HIS3)], PS4342 [MATα his3-Δ200 leu2-Δ1 trp1-Δ1 ura3–52 snf1-Δ10 gsf2-Δ2∷TRP1 (pSNF1-URA3); isogenic to PS4343–11B], HY133 (MATa his3-Δ200 leu2-Δ1 trp1Δ ura3–52 snf3Δ∷HIS3 hxt1Δ∷TRP1∷hxt4Δ hxt2Δ∷LEU2 hxt3Δ∷TRP1 hxt6/7Δ gal2; ref. 13). These strains are derivatives of S288c.
To construct strain PS1332, strain HY133 was transformed first with pMAL63-Ycp50 (14) and then with a DNA fragment containing gsf2Δ∷kanMX, which was obtained by PCR using genomic DNA of strain 10523 (Research Genetics, Huntsville, AL) as template. G418-resistant colonies were selected on YP + 2% maltose containing 0.3 mg/ml geneticin (GIBCO/BRL), and then a gsf2Δ∷kanMX disruptant lacking pMAL63-Ycp50 was isolated. Standard methods for yeast genetic analysis, transformation, and media preparation were used (15, 16). Media contained 2% glucose unless otherwise specified.
Isolation of Multicopy Suppressors.
Strain PS4343–11B, containing pSNF1-URA3 (pCE101; ref. 17) and pSUC2∷HIS3 (pYSH; ref. 18), was transformed with a library of yeast genomic DNA constructed in the multicopy (2 μ) LEU2 vector YEp13 (gift of M. A. Osley, Sloan–Kettering Institute, New York). Leu+ colonies (43,000) were replica plated to medium containing 5-fluoroorotic acid (5-FOA) to select for those that retained viability after the loss of pSNF1-URA3. Thirty-four 5-FOA-resistant candidates were identified and were tested for growth on raffinose and for histidine prototrophy; 6 were Raf+ His+, and 28 were Raf− His−. Southern blots indicated that all 6 Raf+ His+ candidates carried SNF1 plasmids, and 27 of the 28 Raf− His− candidates carried GSF2 plasmids. The single remaining multicopy suppressor plasmid was designated pHCS1.
Plasmids.
pADH1∷HXT1 contains a PCR-generated BamHI/XhoI fragment of HXT1 (from start to stop codon) in the 2 μ vector pSK134 (gift of S. Kuchin, Columbia University). pHXT1 contains a 3.5-kb SacI–NheI (vector site) fragment of pHCS1 in SacI–XbaI-digested pRS315 (19). pHXT1–GFP contains a green fluorescent protein (GFP)-encoding, PCR-generated NotI fragment from pSF-GP1 (20) in pHXT1-N, a derivative of pHXT1 with a NotI site 5′ to the termination codon. p(U)HXT1 and p(U)HXT1–GFP contain a SacI-BamHI fragment of pHXT1 and pHXT1-GFP, respectively, in pRS316 (19). pHA-GSF2 contains a NotI fragment of pGTEP (21), encoding a triple-hemagglutinin (HA) epitope, in pN-RM1 (9). pGFP-GSF2 contains the NotI GFP PCR product in pN–RM1. pGSF2 pRM1 (9) contains GSF2 in pRS315. pAK145 and pAK146 contain HXT2 and HXT2-GFP, respectively, in vector YCplac33, and pAK104 and pAK166 contain GAL2 and GAL2-GFP, respectively, in pRS416 (generous gift of A. Kruckeberg, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands).
Subcellular Fractionation.
Cells were grown to mid-logarithmic phase in synthetic complete (SC) − Leu medium containing 4% glucose, and subcellular fractionation was performed as described (11) except that lysis buffer contained 0.3 M mannitol, 0.1 M KCl, 50 mM Tris⋅HCl (pH 7.5), 1 mM EGTA (22), and Complete protease inhibitors (Boehringer Mannheim). Briefly, cleared spheroplast lysates were centrifuged at 13,000 × g to generate pellet (P13) and supernatant (S13) fractions. The P13 fraction was resuspended in lysis buffer, and aliquots were washed in buffer with no additions or buffer adjusted to 1 M NaCl or 1% Triton X-100. The washed fractions were centrifuged at 13,000 × g to generate new pellet and supernatant fractions. Proteins were precipitated with 10% trichloroacetic acid and resuspended in Laemmli sample buffer.
Immunoblot Analysis.
Standard methods for SDS/PAGE and immunoblotting were used. Immunoblot analysis was performed by using anti-HA antibody (12CA5, Boehringer Mannheim) or anti-GFP antibody (7.1:13.1, Boehringer Mannheim) in combination with peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse Ig secondary antibody (NA 931, Amersham Pharmacia) and a chemiluminescent detection system (ECL, Amersham Pharmacia).
Fluorescence Microscopy.
Autofluorescence of GFP fusion proteins was visualized in unfixed cells by using a Nikon Eclipse E800 (Figs. 2, 3, and 5) or a Zeiss Axioplan II microscope (Fig. 4). Images were captured by using a digital camera (Orca-100, Inovision, Raleigh, NC or Sensicam, Cooke, Auburn Hills, MI) and imaging system (IPLab, Scanalytics, Fairfax, VA; Image Capture Software 3.1, Phase One, Northport, NY), and were converted to Adobe photoshop files for processing.
Analysis of gsf2-1 Allele.
The gsf2–1 allele was recovered by gap repair (23) of XbaI-digested pGSF2. Both strands of two independently gap-repaired plasmids containing the gsf2–1 mutation within a 0.4-kb XbaI fragment were sequenced, along with the corresponding region of pGSF2.
RESULTS
Increased Dosage of the HXT1 Glucose Transporter Gene Suppresses the Synthetic Lethal Phenotype of gsf2 snf1 Mutants.
To isolate multicopy suppressors of the synthetic lethal phenotype caused by gsf2-1 in combination with snf1Δ, we sought plasmids that would allow loss of pSNF1–URA3 from a gsf2-1 snf1Δ strain. The strain was transformed with a multicopy library of yeast genomic DNA, and transformants that retained viability following selection for loss of pSNF1-URA3 were identified (see Materials And Methods). In addition to transformants carrying SNF1 and GSF2 plasmids, one transformant carried a putative multicopy suppressor. Sequence analysis of the plasmid revealed two ORFs, YHR095w and HXT1. Subcloning indicated that YHR095w was not sufficient for suppression. However, expression of the HXT1 gene from the ADH1 promoter on the plasmid pADH1∷HXT1 suppressed the synthetic lethal phenotype of gsf2-1 snf1Δ and gsf2-Δ2 snf1Δ strains (Fig. 1A and data not shown). The gsf2-1 mutation alters the Gln-260 codon to a stop codon (Fig. 2A), and gsf2-Δ2 is a deletion of the entire coding region (9).
We next examined whether pADH1∷HXT1 suppresses the glucose-repression defect caused by gsf2. Glucose repression was monitored by assaying expression of the SUC2 promoter fused to a HIS3 reporter carried on pSUC2∷HIS3 (18). his3Δ strains with pSUC2∷HIS3 are His− on glucose medium (Fig. 1B, row 2), whereas the relief of glucose repression in gsf2 his3Δ mutants confers a His+ phenotype (9) (Fig. 1B, row 1). pADH1∷HXT1 suppressed the glucose-repression defect (Fig. 1B, row 3); in contrast, a centromeric plasmid expressing HXT1 from its own promoter did not suppress this defect, indicating that overexpression of HXT1 is required (Fig. 1B, row 4).
gsf2 Mutation Does Not Reduce Hxt1p Biosynthesis.
The ability of HXT1 overexpression to suppress gsf2 mutant phenotypes suggested that gsf2 mutants are deficient in some aspect of glucose transporter biosynthesis or function. Hxt1p and Hxt3p are closely related (86% identical) and contribute the bulk of glucose transporter activity in glucose-grown cells (3). A defect in transcription of the HXT1 and HXT3 genes in gsf2 mutants is unlikely, because an HXT1∷lacZ reporter is expressed at similar levels in wild-type and gsf2 mutant strains (9), and we found that an HXT3∷lacZ reporter [pBM2819 (5)] is also well expressed in both strains [154 ± 5 and 337 ± 26 units of β-galactosidase activity (24), respectively]. Moreover, expression of an Hxt1–GFP fusion from the HXT1 promoter on a centromeric plasmid was comparable in wild-type and gsf2Δ strains (Fig. 3A). The electrophoretic mobility of Hxt1–GFP was greater in the gsf2Δ mutant than in wild-type, which is likely a consequence of the accumulation of Hxt1–GFP in the ER (see below).
Gsf2p Is an Integral Membrane Protein Localized to the ER.
Because Gsf2p contains a putative transmembrane domain (Fig. 2A), we determined whether Gsf2p is present in a membrane fraction. A gsf2Δ strain was transformed with the centromeric plasmid pHA-GSF2, which bears the native GSF2 promoter and encodes a functional Gsf2p tagged at the N terminus with a triple HA epitope. Crude spheroplast lysates were prepared and fractionated into 13,000 × g pellet (P13) and supernatant (S13) fractions. Immunoblot analysis detected a 46-kDa species corresponding to HA–Gsf2p only in the P13 fraction (data not shown). Washing the P13 fraction with 1 M NaCl was not sufficient to render HA–Gsf2p soluble; however, washing the P13 fraction with 1% Triton X-100 readily solubilized HA–Gsf2p (Fig. 2B). These results indicate that Gsf2p is an integral membrane protein.
Gsf2p contains a C-terminal dilysine motif for retrieval of transmembrane proteins to the ER (Fig. 2A; refs. 10 and 11). To determine the subcellular localization of Gsf2p, we constructed the centromeric plasmid pGFP–GSF2, which bears the GSF2 promoter and encodes an N-terminal fusion of GFP to Gsf2p. This plasmid complements a gsf2Δ mutant (Fig. 1B, row 5). gsf2Δ cells containing pGFP–GSF2 were grown to mid-logarithmic phase in glucose medium and examined by fluorescence microscopy. A perinuclear pattern of fluorescence with discontinuous peripheral cisterna (25) was observed (Fig. 2C), consistent with an ER localization of Gsf2p (26–29). Similar fluorescence patterns were observed in cells grown to stationary phase in glucose and in cells grown to mid-logarithmic phase in 5% glycerol/2% ethanol (data not shown).
To determine whether the expression of Gsf2p is modulated by glucose availability, a gsf2Δ strain transformed with pHA–GSF2 was grown in medium containing either 5% glucose, 3% galactose/3% glycerol/2% ethanol, or 5% glycerol/2% ethanol. Immunoblot analysis revealed no significant differences in the levels of HA–Gsf2p and no differential posttranslational modification (data not shown).
gsf2Δ Mutations Cause an Accumulation of Hxt1–GFP in the ER and a Glucose Growth Defect.
Because Gsf2p is localized to the ER and HXT1 overexpression suppresses gsf2 mutations, we examined the possibility that Gsf2p influences an ER-localized aspect of Hxt1p maturation or secretion. The centromeric plasmid pHXT1–GFP bears the HXT1 promoter and encodes an Hxt1–GFP fusion protein which restores glucose transporter function as effectively as native Hxt1p to a strain deleted for all major glucose transporter genes (hxtΔ, Fig. 3B). pHXT1–GFP was introduced into wild-type and gsf2Δ cells, cultures were grown in glycerol/ethanol medium, and Hxt1–GFP synthesis was induced by the addition of glucose. The localization of Hxt1–GFP was monitored by using fluorescence microscopy (Fig. 3C). No fluorescence was detected before glucose addition (data not shown). At 90 min after glucose addition, fluorescence was observed in the periphery of wild-type cells, consistent with the expected plasma membrane localization of Hxt1p (Fig. 3C). In gsf2Δ cells, patchy fluorescence was observed in the cell periphery, and a striking pattern of fluorescence was observed in the ER of nearly all cells (Fig. 3C). In contrast, ER-localized fluorescence was never observed in wild-type cells. Similar fluorescence patterns were observed at 30, 60, and 120 min after glucose addition; however, at 30 min, overall fluorescence intensity was lower and the patterns were less distinct (data not shown). gsf2Δ cells grown for several generations in glucose medium also displayed ER-localized and peripheral fluorescence, whereas wild-type cells did not show any ER-localized fluorescence (Fig. 3C).
Consistent with the observation that gsf2Δ does not completely block secretion of Hxt1–GFP, disruption of GSF2 in the hxtΔ strain decreased, but did not abolish, the ability of Hxt1p and Hxt1–GFP to support growth on glucose (Fig. 3B). In addition, these growth phenotypes indicate that at least a portion of the plasma membrane-localized Hxt1p and Hxt1–GFP in gsf2Δ mutants is functional.
gsf2 Mutations Affect the Localization of the Galactose Transporter Gal2p and Cause a Galactose Growth Defect.
The S. cerevisiae galactose transporter, Gal2p, is closely related to Hxt1p [69% identity, 83% similarity; (6)] and is capable of transporting glucose in addition to galactose (13). We therefore examined whether mutations in GSF2 affect galactose utilization. A gsf2Δ strain bearing pGSF2 or the parent vector pRS315 was tested for growth on galactose at 24°, 30°, and 37°. A growth defect of gsf2Δ cells was observed at all temperatures and was most pronounced at 24° (Fig. 4A). A multicopy plasmid containing GAL2 partially suppressed this growth defect (data not shown).
We next examined the subcellular localization of a Gal2–GFP fusion protein in wild-type and gsf2Δ strains. The centromeric plasmid pAK166 bears the GAL2 promoter and encodes Gal2–GFP, which restores galactose transporter function as effectively as native Gal2p to a gal2 strain (Fig. 4B). Immunoblot analysis showed that full-length Gal2–GFP is expressed in the gsf2Δ mutant, although levels were lower than in the wild-type 90 min after galactose induction (Fig. 4C). Wild-type and gsf2Δ strains bearing pAK166 were grown in glycerol/ethanol medium, Gal2–GFP synthesis was induced by the addition of galactose, and the localization of Gal2–GFP was monitored by using fluorescence microscopy. At 90 min after galactose addition, fluorescence was observed in the periphery of wild-type cells, consistent with the expected plasma membrane localization of Gal2p (Fig. 4D). In the gsf2Δ mutant, however, a punctate cytoplasmic pattern of fluorescence was observed (Fig. 4D). After growth for many generations in galactose, both wild-type and mutant cells displayed peripheral fluorescence and occasional cytoplasmic concentrations of fluorescence; however, an abnormal pattern remained evident in the gsf2Δ mutant (Fig. 4D). Consistent with these findings, the gsf2Δ mutation decreased, but did not abolish, the ability of both Gal2p and Gal2–GFP to support growth on galactose (Fig. 4B).
Specificity of Gsf2p Function.
To determine whether gsf2Δ affects other hexose transporters, we next examined Hxt2p function and localization in a gsf2Δ mutant. Hxt2p is a high-affinity glucose transporter that belongs to the subfamily of hexose transporters that includes Hxt1p and Gal2p (4). Hxt2p is 62% identical, 78% similar to Hxt1p (1). The gsf2Δ mutation did not noticeably impair the ability of an hxtΔ strain expressing Hxt2p or Hxt2-GFP to grow on glucose (Fig. 5A). Moreover, no striking difference in the localization of Hxt2–GFP in wild-type and gsf2Δ strains was observed (Fig. 5B).
We also examined the ability of gsf2Δ mutants to utilize the disaccharide maltose. The strains used in this study express two maltose transporters, Mal31p and Agt1p (30), which are more distantly related to Hxt1p [each ≈23% identical, 43% similar to Hxt1p; (1, 30)]. No growth defect of gsf2Δ cells on maltose was observed at 24°C or 30°C (Fig. 4A; data not shown), and both wild-type and gsf2Δ cells grew poorly on maltose at 37°C (data not shown). Deletion of GSF2 in a strain expressing the maltose transporter Mal61p also did not impair growth on maltose (data not shown).
We next examined whether Gsf2p has a role in the trafficking of amino acid permeases similar to that of Shr3p. Shr3p is an ER-resident integral membrane protein that is required for the export of amino acid permeases from the ER (28, 31, 32). Because shr3Δ mutants are defective in amino acid transport, shr3Δ is synthetic lethal in combination with amino acid auxotrophic mutations, including leu2, his3, and trp1 (28). In contrast, gsf2Δ his3, gsf2Δ leu2 his3, and gsf2Δ leu2 his3 trp1 mutants are viable (this study; ref. 9). gsf2Δ mutants therefore do not have an amino acid transport defect similar to that conferred by shr3Δ.
DISCUSSION
The GSF2 gene was previously identified in a screen for mutants defective in signaling the presence of high glucose levels (9). In this study, we isolated HXT1 as a multicopy suppressor of a gsf2 mutation, indicating a role for Gsf2p in glucose transporter function. We have shown that Gsf2p is an integral membrane protein localized to the ER and that Hxt1–GFP accumulates in the ER of gsf2Δ mutants. The localization of the galactose transporter Gal2p is also aberrant in gsf2Δ mutants.
Several lines of evidence suggest that the function of Gsf2p is specific for certain transporters. gsf2Δ mutants show normal localization of Hxt2p and exhibit growth phenotypes indicating normal maltose transporter and amino acid permease function. The mutants also do not display defects in derepression of secreted invertase activity or other phenotypes associated with global alterations in secretion (9). Thus, Gsf2p appears to play a role in the secretion of a select group of proteins.
Several possible functions for Gsf2p can be envisioned. One plausible model is that Gsf2p assists the maturation of Hxt1p and Gal2p into conformations competent for trafficking through the secretory pathway. This model is compatible with the different effects of gsf2Δ on Hxt1p and Gal2p and with the partial localization of Hxt1p and Gal2p to the plasma membrane. Alternatively, Gsf2p could affect the entry of certain cargo into transport vesicles. In this model, Hxt1p molecules accumulate in the ER of gsf2Δ mutants because of a blockage or delay in vesicle entry; it is less clear how this model could account for the different localization pattern observed for Gal2p.
The function of Gsf2p may be related to the roles of other ER integral membrane proteins, such as Shr3p, Erv14p, or p24 proteins. Mutants defective in the ER-resident protein Shr3p accumulate amino acid permeases in the ER (28). Coat protein II (COPII)-coated vesicles transport proteins from the ER to the Golgi apparatus (33), and Shr3p is required for the formation of amino acid permease–COPII complexes in the ER prior to vesicle budding (32). However, Shr3p is not included in these complexes and appears to function before the recognition of permeases by COPII components (31, 32). Erv14p is required for the export of the membrane glycoprotein Axl2p from the ER (34). Erv14p appears to cycle between the ER and Golgi, and it has been proposed that interactions of Erv14p with Axl2p mediate the entry of Axl2p into COPII-coated vesicles (34). Finally, p24 proteins, including Emp24p/Bst2p and Erv25p, may regulate vesicle assembly or function as cargo adaptors for selected secretory proteins (35–37).
The observation that Hxt1p accumulates in the ER of gsf2 mutants can account for the glucose repression defect of these mutants. A decrease in the number of glucose transporters at the plasma membrane could reduce glucose transport to a level insufficient to trigger glucose repression (8). Overexpressing Hxt1p in gsf2 mutants presumably increases the number of glucose transporters at the plasma membrane and suppresses the glucose-repression defect.
Our findings also explain the synthetic lethal interaction of gsf2 and snf1 mutations (9). The defect in glucose transporter function in gsf2 mutants essentially subjects cells to glucose limitation, as indicated by the relief of glucose repression of SUC2 and GAL10 transcription (9). Because the Snf1 protein kinase is required for growth in glucose-limiting conditions (12), gsf2 and snf1 exhibit a synthetic-lethal phenotype.
Glucose transporter structure and function are widely conserved among eukaryotes (1, 3, 4). In addition, mammalian sequences with homology to Gsf2p are present in several databases. Given the importance of glucose transport and its regulation in human physiology and pathology, it will be interesting to further explore Gsf2p-related functions in yeast and other organisms.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to A. Kruckeberg for generously providing plasmids. We also thank F. Chang, A. Paoletti, and M. Smith for assistance with microscopy; R. Gaber, M. A. Osley, J. Hirsch, and C. Michels for strains and plasmids; and S. Kuchin, P. Sanz, and O. Vincent for valuable discussions. This work was supported by a National Institutes of Health grant (GM34095) to M.C. and a Damon Runyon-Walter Winchell Cancer Research Fund Postdoctoral Fellowship (DRG-1237) to P.S.
ABBREVIATIONS
- ER
endoplasmic reticulum
- 5-FOA
5-fluoroorotic acid
- GFP
green fluorescent protein
- HA
hemagglutinin
- SC
synthetic complete
Footnotes
This paper was submitted directly (Track II) to the Proceedings Office.
References
- 1.Bisson L F, Coons D M, Kruckeberg A L, Lewis D A. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 1993;28:259–308. doi: 10.3109/10409239309078437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kruckeberg A L. Arch Microbiol. 1996;166:283–292. doi: 10.1007/s002030050385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Boles E, Hollenberg C P. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 1997;21:85–111. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.1997.tb00346.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Nelissen B, De Wachter R, Goffeau A. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 1997;21:113–134. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.1997.tb00347.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Özcan S, Johnston M. Mol Cell Biol. 1995;15:1564–1572. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.3.1564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lewis D A, Bisson L F. Mol Cell Biol. 1991;11:3804–3813. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.7.3804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ko C H, Liang H, Gaber R F. Mol Cell Biol. 1993;13:638–648. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.1.638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Reifenberger E, Boles E, Ciriacy M. Eur J Biochem. 1997;245:324–333. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1997.00324.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sherwood P W, Carlson M. Genetics. 1997;147:557–566. doi: 10.1093/genetics/147.2.557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Jackson M R, Nilsson T, Peterson P A. EMBO J. 1990;9:3153–3162. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb07513.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Gaynor E C, te Heesen S, Graham T R, Aebi M, Emr S D. J Cell Biol. 1994;127:653–665. doi: 10.1083/jcb.127.3.653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Carlson M. Curr Opin Genet Devel. 1998;8:560–564. doi: 10.1016/s0959-437x(98)80011-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Liang H, Gaber R F. Mol Biol Cell. 1996;7:1953–1966. doi: 10.1091/mbc.7.12.1953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Medintz I, Jiang H, Han E K, Cui W, Michels C A. J Bacteriol. 1996;178:2245–2254. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.8.2245-2254.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Rose M D, Winston F, Hieter P. Methods in Yeast Genetics: A Laboratory Course Manual. Plainview, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Lab. Press; 1990. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gietz D, St. Jean A, Woods R A, Schiestl R H. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992;20:1425. doi: 10.1093/nar/20.6.1425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Celenza J L, Carlson M. Mol Cell Biol. 1989;9:5034–5044. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.11.5034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Tu J, Carlson M. Mol Cell Biol. 1994;14:6789–6796. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.10.6789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sikorski R S, Hieter P. Genetics. 1989;122:19–27. doi: 10.1093/genetics/122.1.19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kim J, Hirsch J P. Genetics. 1998;149:795–805. doi: 10.1093/genetics/149.2.795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Tokiwa G, Tyers M, Volpe T, Futcher B. Nature (London) 1994;371:342–345. doi: 10.1038/371342a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Deshaies R J, Schekman R. J Cell Biol. 1987;105:633–645. doi: 10.1083/jcb.105.2.633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Orr-Weaver T L, Szostak J W, Rothstein R J. Methods Enzymol. 1983;101:228–245. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(83)01017-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Guarente L. Methods Enzymol. 1983;101:181–191. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(83)01013-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kaiser C A, Gimeno R E, Shaywitz D A. In: The Molecular and Cellular Biology of the Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Pringle J R, Broach J R, Jones E W, editors. Plainview, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Lab. Press; 1997. pp. 91–226. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Rose M D, Misra L M, Vogel J P. Cell. 1989;57:1211–1221. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90058-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Deshaies R J, Schekman R. Mol Cell Biol. 1990;10:6024–6035. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.11.6024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ljungdahl P O, Gimeno C J, Styles C A, Fink G R. Cell. 1992;71:463–478. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90515-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Sato M, Sato K, Nakano A. J Cell Biol. 1996;134:279–293. doi: 10.1083/jcb.134.2.279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Han E-K, Cotty F, Sottas C, Jiang H, Michels C A. Mol Microbiol. 1995;17:1093–1107. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1995.mmi_17061093.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kuehn M J, Schekman R, Ljungdahl P O. J Cell Biol. 1996;135:585–595. doi: 10.1083/jcb.135.3.585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kuehn M J, Herrmann J M, Schekman R. Nature (London) 1998;391:187–190. doi: 10.1038/34438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kuehn M J, Schekman R. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1997;9:477–483. doi: 10.1016/s0955-0674(97)80022-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Powers J, Barlowe C. J Cell Biol. 1998;142:1209–1222. doi: 10.1083/jcb.142.5.1209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Schimmöller F, Singer-Krüger B, Krüger U, Barlowe C, Riezman H. EMBO J. 1995;14:1329–1339. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07119.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Elrod-Erickson M J, Kaiser C A. Mol Biol Cell. 1996;7:1043–1058. doi: 10.1091/mbc.7.7.1043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Belden W J, Barlowe C. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:26939–26946. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.43.26939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]