Skip to main content
. 2007 Sep 18;274(1628):2971–2979. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2007.1043

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Phylogenetically independent contrasts analysis of allometry for sexual size dimorphism versus (a) degree of polygamy, y=0.071x, p<0.0001 (with outlier removed: y=0.073x, p<0.0001, R2=0.17) and (b) aerial display agility, y=0.014x, p=0.001. Contrasts in allometric slopes were calculated on log-transformed values.