Table IV.
Significance of differences | Young recipienta | Aged recipienta | p-value |
---|---|---|---|
% of donor pro–B cells that are GFP+ | 71 ± 5.1 | 37 ± 21 | <0.001 |
% of donor pro–B cells that are VEX+ | 33 ± 4.8 | 17 ± 6.4 | <0.001 |
Pre:pro ratiob | 3.2 ± 0.56 | 0.66 ± 0.56 | |
Log of pre:pro ratioc | 1.1 ± 0.18 | −0.83 ± 1.0 | <0.001 |
Correlations b/t characteristics, all mice (n = 30) |
log pre:pro ratio | % of pro–B cells that are GFP+ |
% of donor pro–B cells that are VEX+ |
Log pre:pro ratio | r = 0.812, P < 0.001 | r = 0.860, P < 0.001 | |
% of pro–B cells that are GFP+ | r = 0.812, P < 0.001 | r = 0.835, P < 0.001 | |
% of pro–B cells that are VEX+ | r = 0.860, P < 0.001 | r = 0.835, P < 0.001 | |
Correlations b/t characteristics, aged recipient mice (n = 17) |
log pre:pro ratio | % of pro–B cells that are GFP+ |
% of donor pro–B cells that are VEX+ |
Log pre:pro ratio | r = 0.550, P = 0.022 | r = 0.670, P = 0.003 | |
% of pro–B cells that are GFP+ | r = 0.550, P = 0.022 | r = 0.634, P = 0.006 | |
% of pro–B cells that are VEX+ | r = 0.670, P = 0.003 | r = 0.634, P = 0.006 |
CD45.1 NG × H2-SVEX double transgenic mice (GFP serves as a reporter of rag2 expression, and VEX serves as a reporter of V(D)J recombinase activity) were used as donors for adoptive transfer. Bone marrow was harvested from wild-type young (3–4 mo at time of harvest) and aged (23–29 mo at time of harvest) CD45.2 recipient mice 5–6 wk after adoptive transfer of bone marrow from young (1–3 mo) NG × H2-SVEX CD45.1 mice. Pro–B (IgM−B220+CD43+) and pre–B cells (IgM−B220+CD43−) of donor origin were identified based on expression of CD45.1, using flow cytometry as described in Materials and Methods.
Means ± SD are presented.
The pre:pro ratio was calculated by dividing the number of pre–B cells by the number of pro–B cells. Numbers of pro–B and pre–B cells in bone marrow were determined by multiplying the frequency by the leg bone marrow cell number determined by counting to obtain total numbers.
Log of the pre:pro–B ratio was used because its distribution was normal, whereas the ratio was not.
n, number of mice; r, correlation coefficient.