Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Jan 24.
Published in final edited form as: Nature. 2007 Jun 14;447(7146):799–816. doi: 10.1038/nature05874

Table 3.

Different categories of TSSs defined on the basis of support from different transcript-survey methods.

Category Transcript survey method No. TSS clusters (non-redundant)1 P-value2 % singleton clusters3

Known GENCODE 5′ ends 1,730 2e-70 25% (74% overall)
GENCODE sense exons 1,437 6e-39 64%
Novel GENCODE antisense exons 521 3e-8 65%
Unbiased transcription survey 639 7e-63 71%
CpG island 164 4e-90 60%
Unsupported None 2,666 - 83.4%
1

Number of TSS clusters with this support, excluding TSSs from higher categories.

2

Probability of overlap between the transcript support and the Pet/CAGE tags, as calculated by the Genome Structure Correction statistic (see Supplementary Information section S1.3).

3

Percent of clusters with only one tag. For the Known category this was calculated as the percent of GENCODE 5′ ends with Tag support (25%) or overall (74%).