Skip to main content
. 1998 Aug 17;188(4):681–688. doi: 10.1084/jem.188.4.681

Table 2.

Influence of the Route of Administration on pXL2 Immunogenicity and Protective Ability

Immunogen Route Mean anti-RSV F ELISA titer
IgG1/IgG2a Mean plaque reduction titer Mean virus lung titer* No. fully protected mice/ No. immunized mice
IgG IgG1 IgG2a
Log2 titer/100 + SD Log2± SD Log10 PFU/g ± SD
A pXL2 i.m. 7.63 ± 0.92 4.25 ± 1.91 4.00 ± 1.71  1.06 10.49 ± 0.76 0.00 ± 0.00 9/9
pXL2 i.d. 7.35 ± 1.00 5.00 ± 1.00 0.50 ± 1.27 10.00  8.60 ± 2.00 0.43 ± 1.13 8/9
pXL0 i.m. 0.50 ± 0.51 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00  0.36 ± 0.50 4.30 ± 0.22 0/9
B RSV i.n. 9.00 ± 0.67 5.00 ± 0.82 6.90 ± 0.57  0.73 12.88 ± 0.34 0.00 ± 0.00 9/9
FI-RSV i.m. 7.10 ± 0.99 4.60 ± 0.97 0.00 ± 0.00 infinite  9.20 ± 1.10 0.00 ± 0.00 9/9

Mice were immunized with pXL2 (100 μg), pXL0 (100 μg), RSV (106 PFU), or FI-RSV (100 μl) at 0 and 6 wk. Immune sera were analyzed at wk 9, 1 wk before the RSV challenge (106 PFU, i.n.). Lung RSV titers were determined 4 d after challenge.  

*

 Detection sensitivity: 101.69 PFU/g lung.  

 “Fully protected mice” refers to animals with no detectable RSV in lungs after RSV challenge.