Table 2.
template type | cDNA clone | EST clone | primary cDNA | total | ||||||||||||
ORFs targeted | # total | # posa | %b | %c | # total | # posa | %b | %c | # total | # posa | %b | %c | # total | # posa | %b | %c |
1. amplification | 1712 | 1303 | 76 | 76 | 368 | 267 | 73 | 73 | 156 | 39 | 25 | 25 | 2236 | 1609 | 72 | 72 |
reamplificationd | 409 | 162 | 40 | 9 | 101 | 39 | 39 | 11 | 117 | 25 | 21 | 16 | 627 | 226 | 36 | 10 |
amplified with alternative template | 103 | 80 | 78 | 5 | 28 | 22 | 79 | 6 | 61 | 15 | 25 | 10 | 192 | 117 | 61 | 5 |
amplified with alternative 1-step primers | 32 | 26 | 81 | 2 | 16 | 13 | 81 | 4 | 21 | 6 | 29 | 4 | 69 | 45 | 65 | 2 |
Sum | 1712e | 1571 | 92 | 368e | 341 | 94 | 156e | 85 | 55 | 2236f | 1997 | 89 |
a Number of ORFs with expected product size obtained by PCR.
b Sucess rate of the respective reaction step.
c Contribution of each step to the final PCR success rate (rounded values).
d Reamplification with slight modifications of the PCR protocol depending on result of first amplification.
e Sum of ORFs targeted per template type.
f Total sum of ORFs targeted