Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Clin Nutr. 2007 Dec;86(6):1730–1737. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/86.5.1730

TABLE 2.

Studies that evaluated fiber intake and endometrial cancer risk1

Covariates considered2
Reference Country Age Cases/controls
or total cohort
Exposure
evaluated
Contrast RR/OR 95% CI P for trend A B E S H R
Case-cohort study
 Jain et al, 2000 (9) Canada 40–59 y 221/3697 Dietary fiber >23.2 vs <15.1 g/d 1.24 (0.82, 1.87) NS 1 1 1 1 1 2
Population-based case-control studies
 Potischman et al, 1993 (11) United States 20–74 y 399/296 Dietary fiber >13.6 vs <7.7 g/d 0.7 (0.4, 1.3) 1 1 3 1 1 1
 Goodman et al, 1997 (12) United States 18–84 y 332/511 Dietary fiber >23.9 vs <12.3 g/d 0.47 (0.25, 0.86) 0.02 (1) 1 1 1 1
 Jain et al, 2000 (15) Canada 30–79 y 552/562 Dietary fiber >27.5 vs <17.2 g/d 0.71 (0.49, 1.03) 0.14 1 1 1 1 1 2
Per 10 g 0.89 (0.75, 1.05) 1 1 1 1 1 2
 McCann et al, 2000 (13) United States 40–85 y 232/639 Dietary fiber >32 vs <20 g/d 0.5 (0.3, 1) 0.002 1 1 1 1 1 3
 Littman et al, 2001 (16) United States 45–74 y 679/944 Total fiber >10.7 vs <5.6 g · 1000 kcal−1 · d−1 0.68 (0.47, 0.99) 0.16 1 1 1 1 1
 Xu et al, 2007 (18) China 30–69 y 1204/1212 Dietary fiber 8.1 vs 4.8 g · 1000 kcal−1 ·d−1 0.8 (0.6, 1.0) 1 1 1 1
Hospital-based case-control studies
 Barbone et al, 1993 (10) United States 103/236 Dietary fiber >21.5 vs <16.6 g/d 0.6 (0.3, 1.1) 0.43 1 1 1 1 1 3
 Salazar-Martinez et al, 2005 (14) Mexico 18–81 y 85/629 Dietary fiber >24 vs <13 g/d 1.46 (0.76, 2.79) 0.33 1 1 1 1
1

OR, odds ratio; RR, relative risk; NS, P > 0.05.

2

The numbers in each column refer to the number of covariates adjusted for under that grouping. A, age; B, BMI/weight; E, total energy; S, smoking; H, hormone replacement therapy or estrogen replacement therapy; R, reproductive factors; (1), matched for age.

3

Adjusted for noncarbohydrate calories.