Skip to main content
. 1997 Mar 1;109(3):301–311. doi: 10.1085/jgp.109.3.301

Table I.

Activation Parameters for Eag and Mutant Constructs

Construct Vmid A Vrest
mV mV mV
Eag −4.3 ± 0.6(8) 12.7 ± 0.5(8) −44.9 ± 11.1(16)
S4-1 chimera +84.6 ± 0.7(6) 19.9 ± 0.6(6)
S4-2 chimera +68.5 ± 0.6(6) 26.7 ± 0.5(6)
S3+loop chimera ND ND −78.2 ± 8.8*(20)
Loop chimera ND ND −74.2 ± 9.0*(14)
A345E −51.9 ± 0.4(7) 14.4 ± 0.4(7) −82.1 ± 10.9*(10)
A345R ND ND −69.7 ± 6.3*(7)
L342H +16.3 ± 0.6(4) 15.5 ± 0.5(4) −38.3 ± 14.2(12)
Δ333-337 +11.4 ± 0.6(6) 12.8 ± 0.6(6) −39.5 ± 5.8(15)
I317K +3.7 ± 1.2(7) 17.6 ± 1.0(7) −37.3 ± 7.0(10)

Values for the midpoint potential (Vmid) and the slope factor (A) (in mV, mean ± SEM) were derived from P O-V curves fit with a Boltzmann equation of the form: Inline graphic , where P O is the fraction of open channels obtained from the normalized amplitude of isochronal tail currents after a depolarization to the test potential (V). Activation curves for the S4-1 and S4-2 chimeras did not saturate within the tested voltage range (see Fig. 2 C), leading to inaccurate values for Vmid and A for these mutants. Values for Vmid and A were not determined (ND) for the S3+loop and loop chimeras, and the A345R mutation, which shifted activation far in the hyperpolarized direction. Also shown is the resting membrane potential (Vrest, mean ± SD) in 1 mM KC1 for oocytes expressing each construct. Vrest values marked with  

*

are significantly different from the wild-type eag control (t test, P < 0.01). The number of experiments, n, is given in parentheses.