Skip to main content
. 2000 Mar 1;115(3):351–370. doi: 10.1085/jgp.115.3.351

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Comparison between [Ca2+]i responses evoked by weak and strong depolarization. (A) [Ca2+]i responses elicited by 30 mM K+ (left) and 50 mM K+ before (middle) and during (right) maintained exposure to 1 μM FCCP. Solid curve during the recovery after weak depolarization represents a single exponential (in nM): 35.5 + 242exp(−t/31.3 s). Cell sc0c45. (B) Plots of the total Ca2+ flux (J = −d[Ca2+]i /dt) vs [Ca2+]i for each recovery in A, showing the [Ca2+]i dependence of Ca2+ removal rate. After small [Ca2+]i elevations, recoveries are nearly exponential (linear in the J/[Ca2+]i plot, dashed line), while recoveries after larger [Ca2+]i elevations have two additional components: an outward flux at high [Ca2+]i and an inward flux at lower [Ca2+]i. In the presence of FCCP, the rate of Ca2+ removal is nearly proportional to [Ca2+]i over the majority of the [Ca2+]i range, much like the recovery after weak depolarization, but becomes limited at high [Ca2+]i.