Skip to main content
. 2004 Feb;123(2):167–182. doi: 10.1085/jgp.200308982

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Noise analysis of divalent currents. Pipette solution 9. Currents at varying times, indicated to the right of each trace, in exemplary experiments with 20 mM Ca2+ (A) and 20 mM Ba2+ (C). Data were recorded at 5 kHz sampling and post-filtered at 1 kHz. Currents are shown during the last 180 ms of a 660 ms pulse to −110 mV. Ba2+ currents were corrected for ∼3% residual activation by subtraction of a linear function. This procedure did not significantly affect the value of single-channel current. (B, D) Variance analysis of Ca2+ and Ba2+ currents. Background-subtracted variances (σ2 − σ0 2) plotted as a function of the mean current during the development of Ca2+ current (B) or Ba2+ current (D). Background variance was between 0.5 and 0.6 pA2 in five experiments. The labeled points correspond to traces in A and C. Data are fitted by a linear function (n = 58, correlation coefficient 0.81 for Ca2+; and n = 189, correlation coefficient 0.95 for Ba2+). The slopes indicate a single channel current i of 9.7 ± 0.4 fA for Ca2+ and 80.8 ± 0.8 fA for Ba2+.