. 2008 Feb 13;3(2):e1579. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001579

Table 2. Mean trait value and ANOVAs' results for carrying capacity (logK), glucose consumption rate (−logJ_T ₅₀), growth rate (r), and cell size (−logS).

	df	logK	−logJ_T ₅₀	r	df	−logS ^(a)
*Mean trait value*		17.8	19.89	0.0097		17.84
*Total sum of squares*		37.18	43.8	2.23 10⁻³	34	11.12
*Percent sum of squares* ^(b)
Origin	2	7.78^**	9.16^**	3.34^*		6.38^**
Medium	2	75.49^**	33.80^**	73.90^**		79.91^**
Strain(origin)	9	2.64	1.55	3.83		/
Block(medium)	7	0.83^**	11.44^**	2.42^**		/
Medium^*origin	4	2.58	24.39^**	2.01		5.91^**
Medium^*strain(origin)	18	8.26^**	14.34^**	6.51^**		/
Residual	73	2.42	5.32	7.99		7.80
Total	115

For cell size the ANOVA model is different from the one used for the other traits (see Material and Methods).

df : degree of freedom. (a) As there was only one experimental repetition for cell size, the residual variation also contains differences between strains. (b) Type I sums of squares are expressed as a percentage of the total sum of squares. Significance was assessed under a mixed model with Strain(origin) and Medium*strain(origin) as random effects.

Significant at 5%.

^**

Significant at 1%.

Table 2. Mean trait value and ANOVAs' results for carrying capacity (logK), glucose consumption rate (−logJT 50), growth rate (r), and cell size (−logS).

Table 2. Mean trait value and ANOVAs' results for carrying capacity (logK), glucose consumption rate (−logJ_T ₅₀), growth rate (r), and cell size (−logS).