Skip to main content
Canadian Family Physician logoLink to Canadian Family Physician
. 1988 Oct;34:2261–2265.

Acute Ankle Injuries: Clinical/Radiologic Assessment in Diagnosis

Stephen Lloyd
PMCID: PMC2219194  PMID: 21253256

Abstract

Acute ankle injuries represent a large burden of illness in the primary care/emergency setting. Concern has been expressed in the medical literature about the unnecessary use of X-rays in the assessment of these patients. A literature review was conducted to address the question: “Can clinical examination alone accurately diagnose fractures and sprains in patients with acute ankle injuries?” Published reports offer inconsistent conclusions on the value of clinical criteria in the diagnosis of fractures or sprains. These inconsistent conclusions appear to result from numerous biases, different patient populations studied, varied interpretations of normal and abnormal results, and different groups of examiners. The only criteria associated with the diagnosis of fracture in more than one study are age greater than 40 years, inability to bear weight on examination, “point” or “bone” tenderness, and swelling. Until consistent results are available, no change in the rate of X-ray referral should be expected.

Keywords: acute ankle injuries, clinical diagnosis, epidemiologic methods

Full text

PDF
2264

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brand D. A., Frazier W. H., Kohlhepp W. C., Shea K. M., Hoefer A. M., Ecker M. D., Kornguth P. J., Pais M. J., Light T. R. A protocol for selecting patients with injured extremities who need x-rays. N Engl J Med. 1982 Feb 11;306(6):333–339. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198202113060604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brooks S. C., Potter B. T., Rainey J. B. Inversion injuries of the ankle: clinical assessment and radiographic review. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1981 Feb 21;282(6264):607–608. doi: 10.1136/bmj.282.6264.607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cockshott W. P., Jenkin J. K., Pui M. Limiting the use of routine radiography for acute ankle injuries. Can Med Assoc J. 1983 Jul 15;129(2):129–131. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dunlop M. G., Beattie T. F., White G. K., Raab G. M., Doull R. I. Guidelines for selective radiological assessment of inversion ankle injuries. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1986 Sep 6;293(6547):603–605. doi: 10.1136/bmj.293.6547.603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gleadhill D. N., Thomson J. Y., Simms P. Can more efficient use be made of x ray examinations in the accident and emergency department? Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1987 Apr 11;294(6577):943–947. doi: 10.1136/bmj.294.6577.943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. LETTIN A. W. Diagnosis and treatment of sprained ankle. Br Med J. 1963 Apr 20;1(5337):1056–1060. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.5337.1056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Montague A. P., McQuillan R. F. Clinical assessment of apparently sprained ankle and detection of fracture. Injury. 1985 Sep;16(8):545–546. doi: 10.1016/0020-1383(85)90082-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Svenson J. Need for radiographs in the acutely injured ankle. Lancet. 1988 Jan 30;1(8579):244–245. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(88)91098-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Vargish T., Clarke W. R., Young R. A., Jensen A. The ankle injury--indications for the selective use of X-rays. Injury. 1983 May;14(6):507–512. doi: 10.1016/0020-1383(83)90053-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. de Lacey G., Bradbrooke S. Rationalising requests for x-ray examination of acute ankle injuries. Br Med J. 1979 Jun 16;1(6178):1597–1598. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.6178.1597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Family Physician are provided here courtesy of College of Family Physicians of Canada

RESOURCES