Skip to main content
. 2007 Dec;177(4):2553–2558. doi: 10.1534/genetics.107.081109

TABLE 2.

Selection pressure analysis of ITmD37E- and Vg-C-coding sequences

Sequence 1 Sequence 2 ps pn dS dN dS/dN % aa ID
AaegITmD37E_Ele4.1 AgamITmD37E_Ele1.1 0.11 0.05 0.11 0.06 2.0 87.5
AaegITmD37E_Ele4.1 TambITmD37E_Ele1 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 1.0 89.6
AgamITmD37E_Ele1.1 TambITmD37E_Ele1 0.14 0.04 0.16 0.04 3.6 90.5
AaegVg-C AgamVg-C 0.65 0.22 1.50 0.26 5.7 61.4
AaegVg-C TambVg-C 0.72 0.21 2.52 0.24 10.5 64.4
AgamVg-C TambVg-C 0.80 0.23 NAa 0.28 NAa 60.4
AalbVg-C ApolVg-C 0.30 0.02 0.38 0.02 15.3 94.8
OatrVg-C OepaVg-C 0.12 0.01 0.13 0.01 13.7 97.8

Manually codon-aligned sequences (see supplemental File S4 at http://www.genetics.org/supplemental/) were used to determine selection pressure by SNAP (http://hcv.lanl.gov/content/hcv-db/SNAP/SNAP.html) (Korber 2000), a program that uses the method of Nei and Gojobori (1986). AgamITmD37E_Ele1.1 and TambITmD37E_Ele1 have intact coding sequences. AaegITmD37E_Ele4.1 has multiple frameshifts that were corrected by codon alignment. Most Vg-C sequences were obtained from Isoe (2000). See supplemental File S1 for methods.

a

SNAP does not give an output for dS when ps > 0.75, indicating substitution saturation.