Skip to main content
. 2007 Sep 19;22(11):1553–1559. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0353-7

Table 2.

Participants’ Satisfaction with Consultation

Variable Consultation without genetic information Consultation with genetic information Statistics (ANOVA F; p scores)
Today a lot of new insights about overweight became clear (after intervention) 3.38 (1.1) 3.60 (1.0) F = 2.9 (p = 0.09)
51.6% agreed 65.4% agreed
6 months later 3.05 (1.2) 3.33 (1.0) F = 4.0 (p = 0.046)
40.0% agreed 52.8% agreed
I could benefit from this consultation (agreement after intervention) 4.09 (0.7) 4.11 (0.7) F = 0.9 (p > 0.50)
89.3% agreed 90.0% agreed
6 months later 3.59 (0.9) 3.65 (0.9) F = 0.2 (p > 0.50)
62.3% agreed 63.8% agreed
I think every obese person should receive this consultation (agreement after intervention) 4.45 (0.7) 4.45 (0.7) F = 0.0 (p > 0.50)
92.3% agreed 91.5% agreed
6 months later 4.15 (0.9) 4.10 (0.9) F = 0.2 (p > 0.50)
80.8% agreed 80.8% agreed
I think genetic factors are a major cause of obesity (baseline) 3.67 (1.1) 3.53 (1.1) F = 0.6 (p > 0.50)
After consultation 3.44 (1.1) 3.91 (1.0) F = 12.1 (p = 0.001)
6 months later 3.54 (1.1) 3.63 (1.1) F = 0.2 (p > 0.50)

Range from 1 (not at all) to 5 (yes, exactly); only completers’ data.

Agreement was defined as a rating 4 or 5 of the 5-point Likert scale (5 = yes, I completely agree).