Skip to main content
. 2007 Nov 28;7:44. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-7-44

Table 2.

Change in histopathologic scores (mean ± SD)*

Sham BDL BDL + vehicle BDL + fenofibrate
Portal inflammation 0 3.2 ± 0.2a 3.1 ± 0.7a 2.0 ± 0.5a,b,c
Interface hepatitis 0 1.8 ± 0.7a 1.7 ± 0.9a 1.3 ± 0.6a,b,c
Confluent necrosis 0 2.2 ± 0.a 2.1 ± 0.9a 1.1 ± 0.2a,b,c
Lobar necrosis 0 3.0 ± 0.9a 2.9 ± 0.7a 2.1 ± 0.8a,b,c
Bile duct number/5 portal field 3.5 ± 1.3 18.9 ± 8.0a 17.5 ± 7.1a 23.2 ± 11.1a,b,c

*Comparisons between groups were done by using Kruskal-Wallis test. Paired comparisons are done by using Mann-Whitney U test.

aP < 0.01 versus sham group (Mann-Whitney U)

bP < 0.01 as compared to BDL group (Mann-Whitney U)

cP < 0.01 as compared to BDL + vehicle group (Mann-Whitney U)

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure