Skip to main content
. 2007 Dec 19;8:482. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-8-482

Table 1.

Maximum likelihood solution for the spoke model (ψ = 3.5) and the matrix model (ν = 10.0). We choose the number of clusters that maximizes the likelihood by searching over a range of values of K. The estimated the false negative rate is denoted by ν* and the estimated false positive rate by φ*. For comparison we show the error estimates based on the MIPS complexes, νMIPS and φMIPS, restricted to proteins with MIPS annotation. See also Table 2.

Dataset K ν* φ* νMIPS φMIPS
Gavin02 Spoke model 393 0.423 1.3 × 10-3 0.598 6.5 × 10-3
Matrix model 310 0.752 1.7 × 10-3 0.717 5.2 × 10-3
Gavin06 Spoke model 698 0.547 2.4 × 10-3 0.637 8.3 × 10-3
Matrix model 550 0.807 2.7 × 10-3 0.901 6.4 × 10-3