Skip to main content
. 2007 Dec 19;8:482. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-8-482

Table 6.

Clustering performance of MCODE, MCL and MRF: comparison with the MIPS annotations. We use all proteins in the experiment with annotation.

Dataset MCODE MCL MCL with inter. prob. MRF (spoke) MRF (matrix)
Gavin02 CO 29.0 61.5 62.6 64.4 66.4
PPV 73.6 71.3 71.7 73.5 66.9
Acc 46.2 66.2 67.0 68.8 66.6
All pairs
SN 2.3 68.6 68.9 66.7 62.6
SP 92.5 78.7 82.4 87.9 64.7
Geo. average 14.7 73.0 75.4 76.6 63.6
Gavin06 CO 33.7 64.0 65.7 66.0 67.7
PPV 79.0 62.6 68.6 70.4 67.3
Acc 51.6 63.3 67.2 68.2 67.5
All pairs
SN 4.9 44.1 44.7 37.2 38.2
SP 79.6 18.0 22.5 70.0 66.1
Geo. average 19.7 28.2 31.7 51.0 50.2