Skip to main content
. 1999 May 1;113(5):695–720. doi: 10.1085/jgp.113.5.695

Table IV.

Comparison of Simulation Values and Fitted Values of Rate Constants from Individual Fitting Based on Model 1 (Fig. 11)

[ATP] 5 10 15 20 30 50
μM
k12 Simulation 70  140  210  280  420  700
Fitted 70 ± 17 146 ± 39 168 ± 99  203 ± 123 107 ± 85  192 ± 160
k21 Simulation 95   95   95   95   95   95
Fitted 124 ± 60 121 ± 70  42 ± 55  39 ± 39 5 ± 9 5 ± 9
k23 Simulation 110  220  330  440  660 1100
Fitted 135 ± 38 203 ± 51 236 ± 49 316 ± 54 424 ± 43 726 ± 71
k32 Simulation 1192 1192 1192 1192 1192 1192
Fitted 985 ± 130  902 ± 106 899 ± 96 867 ± 87 729 ± 81 662 ± 93
k34 Simulation 1145 1145 1145 1145 1145 1145
Fitted 922 ± 100 978 ± 72 964 ± 65 983 ± 56 916 ± 48 896 ± 45
k43 Simulation 365  365  365  365  365  365
Fitted 354 ± 22 358 ± 15 356 ± 13 354 ± 11 355 ± 10 351 ± 9
k35 Simulation 418  418  418  418  418  418
Fitted 307 ± 55 326 ± 39 321 ± 34 325 ± 31 293 ± 26 288 ± 24
k53 Simulation 5335 5335 5335 5335 5335 5335
Fitted 4795 ± 1060 5494 ± 810 4957 ± 653 4857 ± 540 4750 ± 487 4673 ± 450

k12 = k12(0)[ATP] and k23 = k23(0)[ATP]. k12(0) and k23(0) are 14 and 22 μM−1s−1, respectively. All rate constants have units of s−1. Simulation values are rate constants used to simulate single channel currents. Fitted values are the rate constants obtained from maximal likelihood analysis of simulated data, using Model 1. Missed events were corrected by imposing a dead time of 0.05 ms.