Skip to main content
. 2007 Nov 16;74(2):462–469. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01612-07

TABLE 1.

Resistance development in H. zea when selected using activated toxin and MVP II

Strain Ga Total no. of insects testedb LC50 (95% FL)c Slope (mean ± SE) RRd
Activated toxin-resistant strain (AR)
    SCe 800 9.13 (5.83-12.53) 1.61 ± 0.41
    AR 4 384 107.64 (75.37-155.6) 1.42 ± 0.3 12.12
    SC 480 8.89 (5.71-13.72) 1.71 ± 0.41
    AR 7 222 321.22 (251.27-371) 1.89 ± 0.13 35.91
    SC 384 8.94 (6.37-15.27) 1.93 ± 0.31
    AR 11 175 1,450 (690-2,392) 1.42 ± 0.47 122.67
    SC 384 11.82 (7.01-19.24) 1.76 ± 0.42
    AR 16 72 f >100
    SC 384 13.90 (9.11-21.44) 2.41 ± 0.51
    AR 19 192 1,390 (743-12,017) 1.39 ± 0.46 92.69
    SC 192 15.00 (9.90-22.45) 2.31 ± 0.52
MVP II-resistant strain (MR)
    SC 0 1,120 26.13 (16.34-35.62) 1.73 ± 0.24
    MR 4 384 384.3 (282.31-568.12) 1.79 ± 0.27 16.61
    SC 640 23.13 (16.34-35.62) 1.73 ± 0.24
    MR 7 672 298.40 (155.16-455.5) 1.67 ± 0.41 12.01
    SC 1,120 24.84 (13.48-41.89) 2.47 ± 0.57
    MR 9-11 g
a

G, generations of H. zea continuously selected with B. thuringiensis.

b

One to five replicates with one to seven concentrations.

c

LC50 values are presented in micrograms of B. thuringiensis protein per gram of diet. FL, fiducial limits.

d

The LC50 for AR divided by the LC50 for SC.

e

SC, susceptible colony.

f

47% survivors at 1.5 mg/g.

g

No selection due to reduced larval number; the resistant strain crashed after 11 generations.