TABLE 2.
Statistical significance of EM observationsa
| Comparison | Linear (n) | Loop (n) | Circle (n) | P value (linear/looped) | P value (linear/circle) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ter1-16T cross-linked | 1,002 | 53 | 102 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| ter1-16T non-cross-linked | 1,983 | 27 | 47 | ||
| ter1-16T RAP1OE cross-linked | 3,277 | 49 | 61 | 0.041 | 0.121 |
| ter1-16T RAP1OE non-cross-linked | 4,874 | 104 | 69 | ||
| ter1-16T rad52Δ cross-linked | 2,809 | 51 | 34 | 0.083 | 0.961 |
| ter1-16T rad52Δ non-cross-linked | 1,592 | 18 | 19 | ||
| ter1-16T cross-linked | 1,002 | 53 | 102 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| ter1-16T RAP1OE cross-linked | 3,277 | 49 | 61 | ||
| ter1-16T cross-linked | 1,002 | 53 | 102 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| ter1-16T rad52Δ cross-linked | 2,809 | 51 | 34 |
Numerical data from preparations 1 and 2 for each condition were pooled, and significance was determined using a two-tailed chi-squared analysis without Yates correction.