Skip to main content
. 2007 Nov 7;46(1):192–197. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01623-07

TABLE 4.

Genotype 2 specimens with discordant results at the subtype level among the three compared methods and corresponding confirmatory results

Specimen Genotype by:
Compared methoda
Confirmatory method (NS5b sequencing)
5′NC reverse hybridization 5′NC sequencing 5′NC and NS5b real-time PCR
1 - 2a/2c 2b 2b
2 - 2a/2c 2a 2c
3 - 2a/2c 2a 2c
4 - 2a/2c 2a 2c
5 - 2a/2c 2a 2j
6 2 2c 2a 2i
7 2ac 2c 2a 2b
8 2ac - 2a 2a
9 2ac - 2a 2a
10 2ac - 2a 2c
11 2ac - 2a 2c
12 2ac - 2a 2c
13 2ac - 2a 2i
14 2ac - 2a 2j
15 2ac - 2a 2j
16 2ac - 2a 2j
a

-, not performed.

b

Specimen classified as a putative new subtype.