Skip to main content
The Journal of Biophysical and Biochemical Cytology logoLink to The Journal of Biophysical and Biochemical Cytology
. 1958 Sep 25;4(5):517–524. doi: 10.1083/jcb.4.5.517

An Anterior-Posterior Gradient of Refractive Index in the Ameba and Its Significance in Ameboid Movement

R D Allen 1, J D Roslansky 1
PMCID: PMC2224538  PMID: 13587543

Abstract

Sustained locomotion in Amoeba proteus and Amoeba dubia results in the establishment of a measureable gradient of refractive index along the anterior-posterior axis of the cell, provided thickness of the specimens is kept constant by even compression under a selected coverglass supported by quartz beams of uniform diameter. The tail region of the ameba develops a higher refractive index, indicative of from 6 to 40 per cent more organic matter (expressed as protein) there than present in the front. This gradient fades on cessation of movement. The average protein concentrations in the crystal-free tails and fronts of 15 A. proteus were 3.9 and 3.4 per cent, respectively. In individual experiments, the tail-front difference ranged from one to eight times the accuracy of the method. Since the gradient of refractive index was shown not to result from extraction of water from the tail by the contractile vacuole, it was interpreted as displacement of water toward the anterior part of the cell during movement. It is suggested that contraction of the ectoplasm drives forward a "tide" of syncretic fluid, the anterior border of which is visible as the hyaline cap, which contains less than 1 per cent protein. The movement of the granular endoplasm into the hyaline cap would then complete the cycle by imbibition of the fluid tide. The theoretical positions of Pantin and of Dellinger have been combined in the proposal that ameba cytoplasm consists of a network of a contractile phase which is able to expel (by syneresis) a highly mobile fluid phase. Some other possible interpretations are discussed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (747.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BARER R., JOSEPH S. The refraction increment of glycogen. Exp Cell Res. 1957 Oct;13(2):438–439. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(57)90034-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. COHEN A. I. Electron microscopic observations of amoeba proteus in growth and inanition. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1957 Nov 25;3(6):859–866. doi: 10.1083/jcb.3.6.859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. GOLDACRE R. J., LORCH I. J. Folding and unfolding of protein molecules in relation to cytoplasmic streaming, amoeboid movement and osmotic work. Nature. 1950 Sep 23;166(4221):497–500. doi: 10.1038/166497a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. HAYASHI T. Contractile properties of compressed monolayers of actomyosin. J Gen Physiol. 1952 Nov;36(2):139–152. doi: 10.1085/jgp.36.2.139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. MEYER K. H., MARK H. Biological significance of folding and unfolding of protein molecules. Nature. 1951 May 5;167(4253):736–736. doi: 10.1038/167736a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. PAPPAS G. D. Helical structures in the nucleus of Amoeba proteus. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1956 Mar 25;2(2):221–222. doi: 10.1083/jcb.2.2.221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. PRESCOTT D. M., GOLDACRE R. J. Relation between dye uptake and cytoplasmic streaming in amoeba proteus. Nature. 1953 Sep 26;172(4378):593–594. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. PRESCOTT D. M., JAMES T. W. Culturing of Amoeba proteus on Tetrahymena. Exp Cell Res. 1955 Feb;8(1):256–258. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(55)90067-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Biophysical and Biochemical Cytology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES