TABLE V.
Comparisons of Log-likelihood and AIC Values for Schemes B1–I1
| Scheme | −70 mV | −110 mV | −150 mV | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LL | AIC | LL | AIC | LL | AIC | |
| B1 | 398,409 | 15 | 461,905 | 15 | 260,617 | 15 |
| C1 | 398,362 | 16 | 461,871 | 16 | 260,606 | 16 |
| C2 | 399,441 | 12 | 462,675 | 12 | 261,402 | 12 |
| C3 | 399,441 | 11 | 462,675 | 11 | 261,402 | 11 |
| C4 | 399,061 | 13 | 462,477 | 13 | 261,307 | 13 |
| D1 | 398,633 | 14 | 461,958 | 14 | 260,874 | 14 |
| E1 | 400,796 | 10 | 463,522 | 10 | 262,221 | 10 |
| F1 | 401,027 | 6 | 463,642 | 2 | 262,310 | 3 |
| F2 | 400,846 | 9 | 463,569 | 9 | 262,253 | 9 |
| F3 | 401,018 | 8 | 463,635 | 7 | 262,287 | 8 |
| F4 | 401,027 | 5 | 463,642 | 1 | 262,310 | 2 |
| G1 | 401,024 | 7 | 463,641 | 2 | 262,292 | 7 |
| G2 | 401,037 | 1 | 463,638 | 6 | 262,306 | 4 |
| G3 | 401,036 | 4 | 463,641 | 5 | 262,306 | 5 |
| H1 | 401,038 | 3 | 463,638 | 8 | 262,306 | 6 |
| I1 | 401,039 | 1 | 463,643 | 2 | 262,314 | 1 |
Log-likelihood (LL) values were generated by maximum likelihood fitting using the program MIL (Qin et al., 1996). AIC ranks were assigned as described in the text.