Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Feb 5.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurophysiol. 2006 Oct 4;97(3):2525–2532. doi: 10.1152/jn.00190.2006

TABLE 2.

Results of significance testing after determining the state sequence with Viterbi analysis


Output Total Seizures, (N) x* y** Predicted Seizures S1/S2 Ratio P-Value
HMM-Viterbi 29 8 0.3329 17 6.1344 2.9525 × 10-8
Algorithm implementation 29 7 0.2963 5 8.4019 0.1898

Values represent the seizure prediction performance of the raw SVM-based seizure detector outputs 1) filtered by HMM-Viterbi decoding vs. 2) the particular implementation of the detector in Gardner et al. (2006). The expected S1/S2 ratio of baseline to detected state for HMM-Viterbi output was calculated by the trained HMM’s transition matrix. The same ratio in the author-implemented case was determined empirically from the data by summation of baseline vs. detected outputs.

*

Minimal number of detected seizures for a type I error of 0.05

**

minimum proportion of detected seizures for a type II error of 0.2.