Skip to main content
. 1998 Apr 15;508(Pt 2):575–585. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1998.575bq.x

Table 1.

Comparison of lateral vein and caudal ventral artery sympathetic activities

Variable Caudal ventral artery Lateral vein
MABP (mmHg) 95 ± 3 98 ± 2 (n.s.)
(n = 17) (n = 17)
Phrenic frequency (Hz) 0.70 ± 0.05 0.65 ± 0.03 (n.s.)
(n = 17) (n = 14)
DSR frequency (Hz) 0.83 ± 0.03 0.82 ± 0.05 (n.s.)
(n = 17) (n = 14)
Mean unit firing 1.78 ± 0.24 1.62 ± 0.70 (n.s.)
frequency (Hz) (n = 17) (n = 14)
Unit firing pattern
   Type A n = 3* n = 3
   Type B n = 7* n = 2
   Type C n = 7* n = 9
   Total n = 17 n = 14
Units showing no rhythm in autocorrelogram 1/18* 3/17
Percentage time not firing rhythmically (300 s) 15* 23

MABP, mean arterial blood pressure. DSR, dominant sympathetic rhythm. n.s., not significantly different to caudal ventral artery values.

*

Authors' unpublished results.

No significant difference between artery and vein distributions (G test). Caudal ventral artery data from Johnson & Gilbey (1996), except where indicated.